[1]王建华,钭露露,马玲.农户融入农业绿色生产转型的驱动机制分析——以农户农业废弃物资源化利用为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(05):165-177.
　WANG Jianhua,TOU Lulu,MA Ling.Analysis of the Driving Mechanism for Farmers’ Integration into Agricultural Green Production Transformation: A Case Study of Agricultural Waste Resource Utilization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(05):165-177.
点击复制

农户融入农业绿色生产转型的驱动机制分析——以农户农业废弃物资源化利用为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
165-177
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2023-10-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Driving Mechanism for Farmers’ Integration into Agricultural Green Production Transformation: A Case Study of Agricultural Waste Resource Utilization
作者:
王建华;  钭露露;  马玲
江南大学 商学院/食品安全风险治理研究院, 无锡 214122
Author(s):
WANG Jianhua;  TOU Lulu;  MA Ling
关键词:
农户认知; 家庭禀赋; 农业废弃物; 资源化利用; 意愿与行为悖离; 农业绿色生产转型
Keywords:
Farmer’s Cognition; Family Endowment; Agricultural Waste; Resource Utilization; Intention-behavior Gap; Agricultural Green Production Transformation
分类号:
F326.3
摘要:
基于计划行为理论，从“认知—意愿—行为”三个阶段分析农户参与农业废弃物资源化利用的驱动机制，并引入家庭禀赋完善理论分析框架，在此基础上利用江苏省实地调研数据对理论机制进行实证检验。研究发现：(1)农户对于农业废弃物资源化利用的认知因素可具体显化为便利条件、难度评价、主观规范与行为态度，且认知因素间存在显著的互动关系。(2)便利条件能够对农业废弃物资源化利用行为产生直接的正向影响，并能够通过难度评价与行为态度间接正向影响农业废弃物资源化利用的意愿与行为；此外，主观规范也能够通过行为态度与农业废弃物资源化利用意愿对农业废弃物资源化利用行为产生间接的正向影响。(3)家庭禀赋特征在农业废弃物资源化利用意愿与行为之间发挥显著的调节作用，农业收入稳定性与农地的平均地块面积是影响农户将农业废弃物资源化利用意愿转化为行为的重要因素。在此基础上，提出了促进农户参与农业废弃物资源化利用的政策建议。
Abstract:
This paper utilizes the theory of planned behavior to analyze the driving mechanism behind farmers’ utilization of agricultural waste resources, focusing on the stages of cognition, intention, and behavior. Additionally, the paper introduces the concept of family endowment to enhance the theoretical framework. The study empirically tests the theoretical mechanism using field survey data from Jiangsu Province. The findings show that:Farmers’ cognitive factors, including convenience conditions, difficulty evaluation, subjective norms, and behavioral attitudes, are significantly interrelated. The convenience of agricultural waste resource utilization directly influences farmers’ behavior and indirectly affects intention and behavior through difficulty evaluation and behavioral attitudes. Moreover, subjective norms indirectly and positively influence behavior through behavioral attitudes and intention. The characteristics of family endowment play a significant moderating role in the relationship between farmers’ intention and behavior. The stability of agricultural income and average plot area are crucial factors that influence the translation from intention to behavior. Based on these research findings, the paper proposes policy recommendations to promote farmers’ participation in agricultural waste resource utilization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 莫经梅,张社梅.城市参与驱动小农户生产绿色转型的行为逻辑——基于成都蒲江箭塔村的经验考察[J].农业经济问题,2021(11):77-88.
[2] 王永仓,王小华.数字普惠金融的农民增收效应及作用机制研究[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,21(3):56-77.
[3] 蒋磊,张俊飚,何可.基于农户兼业视角的农业废弃物资源循环利用意愿及其影响因素比较——以湖北省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(10):1432-1439.
[4] Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991,50(2):179-211.
[5] 郅建功,颜廷武,杨国磊.家庭禀赋视域下农户秸秆还田意愿与行为悖离研究——兼论生态认知的调节效应[J].农业现代化研究,2020,41(6):999-1010.
[6] Lu L X, Liu Y P, Wang C H. Investigation on Farmers’ Willingness to Use Biogas in Area Surrounding the Crested Ibis Nature Reserve[J].China Biogas, 2017,35(1):87-92.
[7] Fang Y R, Wu Y, Xie G H. Crop Residue Utilizations and Potential for Bioethanol Production in China[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 113:109288.
[8] Wang Q, Dogot T, Wu G, et al. Residents’ Willingness for Centralized Biogas Production in Hebei and Shandong Provinces[J].Sustainability, 2019,11(24):71-75.
[9] 陶源,仇相玮,周玉玺,等.风险感知、社会信任与农户有机肥替代行为悖离研究[J].农业技术经济,2022(5):49-64.
[10] 罗岚,李桦,许贝贝.绿色认知、现实情景与农户生物农药施用行为——对意愿与行为悖离的现象解释[J].农业现代化研究,2020,41(4):649-658.
[11] 陈银蓉,王晓妹,梅昀.基于Logit-ISM模型的农户耕地保护意愿与行为的悖离研究——以武汉城市圈为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(4):927-936.
[12] 余威震,罗小锋,李容容,等.绿色认知视角下农户绿色技术采纳意愿与行为悖离研究[J].资源科学,2017,39(8):1573-1583.
[13] 石志恒,张衡.同群效应对农户地膜回收意愿与行为悖离现象的影响研究——基于生态理性的中介作用[J].农业技术经济,2022(8):97-111.
[14] He K, Ye L, Li F, et al. Using Cognition and Risk to Explain the Intention-behavior Gap on Bioenergy Production:Based on Machine Learning Logistic Regression Method[J].Energy Economics, 2022, 108:105885.
[15] 姜维军,颜廷武.能力和机会双轮驱动下农户秸秆还田意愿与行为一致性研究——以湖北省为例[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(1):47-55.
[16] Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):248-287.
[17] 段文婷,江光荣.计划行为理论述评[J].心理科学进展,2008(2):315-320.
[18] 畅倩,颜俨,李晓平,等.为何"说一套做一套"——农户生态生产意愿与行为的悖离研究[J].农业技术经济,2021(4):85-97.
[19] Fang X, Wang L, Sun C, et al. Gap between Words and Actions:Empirical Study on Consistency of Residents Supporting Renewable Energy Development in China[J].Energy Policy,2021, 148:111945.
[20] 丰雷,江丽,郑文博.农户认知、农地确权与农地制度变迁——基于中国5省758农户调查的实证分析[J].公共管理学报,2019,16(1):124-137.
[21] Beckmann J, Kuhl J. Altering Information to Gain Action Control:Functional Aspects of Human Information Processing in Decision Making[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1984,18(2):224-237.
[22] 王子坤,邹伟,王雪琪.农户宅基地退出的行为与意愿悖离研究[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):29-35.
[23] Rhodes R E, K S Couneya. Investigating Multiple Components of Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioral Control:An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Exercise Domain[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,2003,42:129-146.
[24] 王建华,陶君颖,陈璐.养殖户畜禽废弃物资源化处理方式及影响因素研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(5):127-137.
[25] Armitage C J, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour:A Meta-analytic Review[J].British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40 (4):471-499.
[26] Sheeran P, Orbell S. Do Intentions Predict Condom Use? Meta-analysis and Examination of Six Moderator Variables[J].British Journal of Social Psychology, 2011,37 (2):231-250.
[27] Sheeran P. Intention-behavior Relations:A Conceptual and Empirical Review[J].European Review of Social Psychology, 2002,12(1):1-36.
[28] Kashima Y, Gallois C, Mccamish M. The Theory of Reasoned Action and Cooperative Behaviour:It Takes Two to Use A Condom[J].British Journal of Social Psychology, 1993,32 (3):227-239.
[29] Rausch T M, Kopplin C S. Bridge the Gap:Consumers’ Purchase Intention and Behavior Regarding Sustainable Clothing[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 278:123882.
[30] 吕美晔.菜农种植方式选择行为的影响因素研究——基于菜农意愿选择与实际选择差异的视角[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,9(2):48-53.
[31] 朱燕芳,文高辉,胡贤辉,等.基于计划行为理论的耕地面源污染治理农户参与意愿研究——以湘阴县为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(10):2323-2333.
[32] 吕杰,刘浩,薛莹,等.风险规避、社会网络与农户化肥过量施用行为——来自东北三省玉米种植农户的调研数据[J].农业技术经济,2021(7):4-17.
[33] 成蓥,曾维忠,胡原.基于计划行为理论的农户参与林下经济意愿影响因素分析[J].农村经济,2021(11):62-69.
[34] 张娇,李世平,郭悦楠.基于保护动机理论的农户亲环境行为影响因素研究:以秸秆处理为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(5):8-13.
[35] 刘同山,吴刚.城镇化进程中农村土地退出及其优化利用[J].江南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,20(4):27-38.
[36] 姚科艳,陈利根,刘珍珍.农户禀赋、政策因素及作物类型对秸秆还田技术采纳决策的影响[J].农业技术经济,2018(12):64-75.
[37] Tan S N, Heerink N, Qu F. Land Fragmentation and Its Driving Forces in China[J].Land Use Policy, 2006, 23(3):272-285.
[38] Morris M G,Venkatesh V. Age Differences in Technology Adoption Decisions Implications for A Changing Work Force[J].Personnel Psychology, 2000, 53(2):375-403.
[39] 王学婷,张俊飚,童庆蒙.参与农业技术培训能否促进农户实施绿色生产行为?——基于家庭禀赋视角的ESR模型分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(1):202-211.
[40] 张立,王亚华.集体经济如何影响村庄集体行动——以农户参与灌溉设施供给为例[J].中国农村经济,2021(7):44-64.
[41] 张童朝,颜廷武,张俊飚.德政何以善治:村域干群关系如何影响农民参与农业废弃物资源化?——来自四省1372份农户数据的验证[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(1):150-160.
[42] Diamantopoulos A. The Error Term in Formative Measurement Models:Interpretation and Modeling Implications[J].Journal of Modeling in Management,2006,1(1):7-17.

相似文献/References:

[1]狄金华,韦宏耀,钟涨宝.农村子女的家庭禀赋与赡养行为研究——基于CGSS2006数据资料的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(02):35.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(05):35.
[2]聂伟,王小璐.人力资本、家庭禀赋与农民的城镇定居意愿——基于CGSS2010数据库资料分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(05):53.
[3]戚晓明.人力资本、家庭禀赋与被征地农民就业——基于CFPS2014数据的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):59.
　QI Xiaoming.Human Capital, Family Endowment and Employment of Landless Peasants:Analysis Based on CFPS2014 Database[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(05):59.
[4]吕晓,臧涛,张全景.土地政策的农户认知及其农地转出响应研究——基于山东省287份农户问卷调查的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):100.
　LV Xiao,ZANG Tao,ZHANG Quanjing.Farm Households’Cognition of Land Policy and Its Effect on Farmland Transfer:Based on the Investigation of 287 Farmer Households in Shandong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(05):100.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-3-13;改回日期:。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目"食品安全风险社会共治与跨界合作机制研究"(20&ZD117)；国家自然科学基金专项项目"粮食收获环节损失评估与节粮减损政策研究"(72241014)
作者简介:王建华,男,江南大学商学院教授,博士生导师;马玲,女,江南大学商学院硕士生。
通讯作者:钭露露(通信作者),女,江南大学食品安全风险治理研究院助理研究员。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01