[1]钱龙,饶清玲,刘同山.地权稳定性对农户节水灌溉技术采纳行为的影响——来自黄淮海农区的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):135-146.
　QIAN Long,RAO Qingling,LIU Tongshan.The Impact of Land Tenure Stability on the Adoption of Water-saving Irrigation Technology by Peasants: Empirical Evidence from Huanghuaihai Agricultural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):135-146.
点击复制

地权稳定性对农户节水灌溉技术采纳行为的影响——来自黄淮海农区的经验证据()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
135-146
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2022-03-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Impact of Land Tenure Stability on the Adoption of Water-saving Irrigation Technology by Peasants: Empirical Evidence from Huanghuaihai Agricultural Areas
作者:
钱龙1;  饶清玲1;  刘同山2
1. 南京财经大学 粮食和物资学院, 江苏 南京 210003;
2. 南京林业大学 经济管理学院, 江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
QIAN Long1;  RAO Qingling1;  LIU Tongshan2
关键词:
地权稳定性; 节水灌溉技术; 黄淮海农区
Keywords:
Land Tenure Stability; Water-saving Irrigation Technology; Huanghuaihai Agricultural Areas
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
基于地下水"漏斗区"黄淮海农区的调查,探索了地权稳定性对农户节水灌溉技术采纳行为的影响,并进一步探讨了其内在传导机制和农户特征分化情境下的效应差异。研究发现:地权稳定性对农户节水灌溉技术采纳存在显著正向影响,相比未获得确权颁证的农户,已获承包权证书农户采纳概率提升了7.2%。利用LPM模型、PSM模型和工具变量法进行稳健性检验,依然支持上述发现。中介效应模型显示,地权稳定性会通过增强农户连片经营意愿进而促进其采纳节水灌溉技术。进一步从不同代际、家庭经济情况差异、社会资本异质性、作物种植类型差异四个层面进行比较分析,发现老一代种植户、经济状况较好农户、拥有较多社会资本农户、经济作物种植户有着更强烈的节水灌溉技术采纳倾向。最后,本文提出了稳定地权、推进农地流转和土地整理、关注不同特征农户响应分化的政策建议。
Abstract:
Based on the investigation of the groundwater "funnel area" in the Huanghuaihai agricultural areas, this paper explores the impact of land tenure stability on the adoption of water-saving irrigation technology by peasants and further explores its internal transmission mechanism and the differences in technology adoption behaviors in the context of the differentiation of peasants’??characteristics. The study finds that the stability of land rights has a significant positive impact on the adoption of water-saving irrigation technology by peasants. Compared with the peasants who have not obtained the certification, the acceptance probability of peasants who have obtained the contract right certificate has increased by 7.2%. The robustness tests using the LPM model, PSM model, and instrumental variable method all support the above finding. The intermediary effect model shows that the stability of land ownership will encourage peasants to adopt water-saving irrigation technology by increasing their willingness to operate in a continuous manner. This paper further analyzes the heterogeneity of intergenerational status, household economic conditions, social network scale and crop planting types, and finds that the older generation growers, households with better economic conditions and larger social network scales, and cash crop growers all show a stronger tendency to adopt water-saving irrigation technologies. Finally, this paper puts forward policy recommendations for stabilizing land rights, improving farmland transfer markets, and focusing on peasants with different characteristics to respond to differentiation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱启荣,杨琳.我国贫水地区国内与国际贸易中虚拟水净流量及影响因素研究——以山东省为例[J].国际贸易问题,2016(6):70-81.
[2] 刘维哲,唐溧,王西琴,等.农业灌溉用水经济价值及其影响因素——基于剩余价值法和陕西关中地区农户调研数据[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(3):553-562.
[3] 薛彩霞,黄玉祥,韩文霆.政府补贴、采用效果对农户节水灌溉技术持续采用行为的影响研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1418-1428.
[4] 李曼,陆迁,乔丹.技术认知、政府支持与农户节水灌溉技术采用——基于张掖甘州区的调查研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(12):27-32.
[5] 贾蕊,陆迁.信贷约束、社会资本与节水灌溉技术采用——以甘肃张掖为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):54-62.
[6] 孙小龙,郜亮亮,钱龙,等.产权稳定性对农户农田基本建设投资行为的影响[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(4):59-66.
[7] Deininger K, Jin S. Tenure Security and Land-related Investment: Evidence from Ethiopia[J].European Economic Review, 2006, 50(5):1245-1277.
[8] 黄季焜,冀县卿.农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资[J].管理世界,2012(9):76-81,99.
[9] Fort R. The Homogenization Effect of Land Titling on Investment Incentives: Evidence from Peru[J].NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Science, 2008, 55(4):325-343.
[10] 李丰.稻农节水灌溉技术采用行为分析——以干湿交替灌溉技术(AWD)为例[J].农业技术经济,2015(11):53-61.
[11] 廖西元,王磊,王志刚,等.稻农采用节水技术影响因素的实证分析——自然因素和经济因素效应及其交互影响的估测[J].中国农村经济,2006(12):13-19.
[12] 张益,孙小龙,韩一军.社会网络、节水意识对小麦生产节水技术采用的影响——基于冀鲁豫的农户调查数据[J].农业技术经济,2019(11):127-136.
[13] Suárez-Varela M, Martinez-Espineira R, González-Gómez F. An Analysis of the Price Escalation of Non-linear Water Tariffs for Domestic Uses in Spain[J]. Utilities Policy, 2015, 34(9):82-93.
[14] 王金霞,徐志刚,黄季焜,等.水资源管理制度改革、农业生产与反贫困[J].经济学(季刊),2005(4):189-202.
[15] 周力,王镱如.新一轮农地确权对耕地质量保护行为的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):63-71.
[16] Hombrados J G, Devisscher M, Martínez M H. The Impact of Land Titling on Agricultural Production and Agricultural Investments in Tanzania: A Theory-based Approach[J].Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2015,7(4): 530-544.
[17] 林文声,王志刚,王美阳.农地确权、要素配置与农业生产效率——基于中国劳动力动态调查的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):64-82.
[18] ??rum J E, Boesen M V, Jovanovic Z, et al. Farmers’ Incentives to Save Water with New Irrigation Systems and Water Taxation: A Case Study of Serbian Potato Production[J].Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 98(3): 465-471.
[19] 李谷成,冯中朝,范丽霞.小农户真的更加具有效率吗?来自湖北省的经验证据[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(1):95-124.
[20] 程令国,张晔,刘志彪.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?[J].管理世界,2016(1):88-98.
[21] 付江涛,纪月清,胡浩.产权保护与农户土地流转合约选择——兼评新一轮承包地确权颁证对农地流转的影响[J].江海学刊,2016(3):74-80,238.
[22] 李卓,刘淑亮,孙然好,等.黄淮海地区耕地复种指数的时空格局演变[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4454-4460.
[23] 左喆瑜.华北地下水超采区农户对现代节水灌溉技术的支付意愿——基于对山东省德州市宁津县的条件价值调查[J].农业技术经济,2016(6):32-46.
[24] 黄腾,赵佳佳,魏娟,等.节水灌溉技术认知、采用强度与收入效应——基于甘肃省微观农户数据的实证分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(2):347-358.
[25] 耿鹏鹏."规模实现"抑或"技术耗散":地权稳定如何影响农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):108-120.
[26] 洪炜杰,罗必良.地权稳定能激励农户对农地的长期投资吗[J].学术研究,2018(9):78-86,177.
[27] 马贤磊,仇童伟,钱忠好.农地产权安全性与农地流转市场的农户参与——基于江苏、湖北、广西、黑龙江四省(区)调查数据的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2015(2):22-37.
[28] 钱龙,冯永辉,陆华良,等.产权安全性感知对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——以广西为例[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(10):93-101.
[29] 钱龙,钱文荣.外出务工对农户农业生产投资的影响——基于中国家庭动态跟踪调查的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(5):109-121,158.
[30] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[31] Rubin D B. Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation[J].Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2001, 2(3/4): 169-188.
[32] 杨进,钟甫宁,陈志钢,等.农村劳动力价格、人口结构变化对粮食种植结构的影响[J].管理世界,2016(1):78-87.
[33] Chang H, Dong X, MacPhail F. Labor Migration and Time Use Patterns of the Left-behind Children and Elderly in Rural China[J].World Development, 2011, 39 (12) :2199-2210.
[34] 马良灿.理性小农抑或生存小农——实体小农学派对形式小农学派的批判与反思[J].社会科学战线,2014(4):165-172.
[35] 乔丹,陆迁,徐涛,等.信息渠道、学习能力与农户节水灌溉技术选择——基于民勤绿洲的调查研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(2):20-24.

相似文献/References:

[1]乔丹,陆迁,徐涛.社会网络、信息获取与农户节水灌溉技术采用——以甘肃省民勤县为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):147.
　QIAO Dan,LU Qian,XU Tao.Social Networks, Information Acquisition and Water-Saving Irrigation Technology Adoption:An Empirical Analysis from Minqin County, Gansu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(02):147.
[2]耿鹏鹏.“规模实现”抑或“技术耗散”:地权稳定如何影响农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):108.
　GENG Pengpeng.“Achievement of Scale” or “Dissipation of Technology”: How Does Stability ofLand Rights Affect Agricultural Production Efficiency of Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):108.
[3]钱龙,冯永辉,卢华.地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于新一轮确权颁证调节效应的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(02):104.
　QIAN Long,FENG Yonghui,LU Hua.Impact of Land Tenure Stability on Farmer’s Cultivated Land Quality Protection Behavior: Analysis Based on Adjustment Effect of the New Round Land Certification[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):104.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-24。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"农地确权、调整经历与农户耕地质量保护行为:机理与实证"(71803077);国家社会科学基金项目"农地错配的效率损失及其对策研究"(19BJY127)
作者简介:钱龙,男,南京财经大学粮食和物资学院副教授;饶清玲,女,南京财经大学粮食和物资学院硕士生。
通讯作者:刘同山(通信作者),男,南京林业大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01