[1]赵亚莉,龙开胜.农地“三权”分置下耕地生态补偿的理论逻辑与实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):119-127.
　ZHAO Yali,LONG Kaisheng.Theoretical Logic and Realization Paths of Arable Land Ecological Compensation under Tripartite Rural Land Entitlement System[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):119-127.
点击复制

农地“三权”分置下耕地生态补偿的理论逻辑与实现路径()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
119-127
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2020-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical Logic and Realization Paths of Arable Land Ecological Compensation under Tripartite Rural Land Entitlement System
作者:
赵亚莉1;  龙开胜2
1. 河海大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 211100;
2. 南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 210095
Author(s):
ZHAO Yali1;  LONG Kaisheng2
关键词:
“三权”分置; 耕地生态补偿; 生态系统服务; 理论逻辑; 实现路径
Keywords:
Tripartite Rural Land Entitlement System; Arable Land Ecological Compensation; Ecosystem Services; Theoretical Logic; Realization Path
分类号:
F301.21
摘要:
完善耕地生态补偿，是推进耕地生态治理能力建设的需要。本文围绕“三权”分置下耕地权利结构变化和生产经营方式转型两大新情势，阐释耕地生态补偿制度改进的理论逻辑，提出实现路径。“三权”分置下耕地经营权人按照合同利用耕地，不承担与耕地所有权人或承包权人同等的固有法定生态保护责任，具备以耕地生态系统服务贡献为依据进行生态补偿的关键前提；耕地生产经营的规模化和专业化，能够减少交易成本，是建立市场化、多元化耕地生态补偿的保障。通过耕地生态补偿资金的二次分配，改善耕地质量，增加社会公共福祉，能够增强“三权”分置和生态补偿物质基础及群众基础。今后，应构建按照耕地所有权人、承包权人和经营权人生态系统服务贡献分类分级，政府转移支付、市场交易与生态产品认证等多元化方式相结合，所有权人生态补偿二次分配以公共服务支出占主导的生态补偿体系，促进“三权”分置与耕地生态补偿长远发展。
Abstract:
Improving arable land ecological compensation is a need for promoting arable land ecological governance capacity building. Focusing on the two new conditions of arable land rights structure change and production and operation patterns transition under the tripartite rural land entitlement system, the study explains the theoretical logic of improving arable land ecological compensation and puts forward related realization paths. Under the tripartite rural land entitlement system, arable land managers operate land according to the contract and don’t have to undertake inherent legal responsibility of ecological conservation similar to arable land owners or contractors, and all these provide key preconditions for arable land ecological compensation based on stakeholders’ contribution to arable land ecosystem services. Arable land scale and specialization operation, which could decrease transaction cost, is the guarantee to establishing marketable and pluralistic arable land ecological compensation. Through secondary distribution of income from arable land ecological compensation, it can improve arable land quality, increase public welfare, and strengthen the material and mass basis of tripartite rural land entitlement system and arable land ecological compensation. In the future, it should establish realization paths, including classification for arable land owners, contractors and managers’ ecosystem services contribution, pluralistic compensation patterns following transfer payments, market transaction and product eco-certification and so on. And the secondary distribution of landowners’ compensation income with “public services dominated expenditure” should be conducted to promote the long-term development of tripartite rural land entitlement system and arable land ecological compensation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 马爱慧,蔡银莺,张安录.耕地生态补偿相关利益群体博弈分析与解决路径[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):114-119.
[2] 龙开胜,王雨蓉,赵亚莉,等.长三角地区生态补偿利益相关者及其行为响应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(8):43-49.
[3] Wunder S. Payments for Environmental Services and the Poor:Concepts and Preliminary Evidence[J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2008, 13(3):279-297.
[4] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice:An Overview of the Issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4):663-674.
[5] Sattler C, Matzdorf B. PES in a Nutshell:From Definitions and Origins to PES in Practice-Approaches, Design Process and Innovative Aspects[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 6:2-11.
[6] 欧名豪,王坤鹏,郭杰.耕地保护生态补偿机制研究进展[J].农业现代化研究,2019,40(3):357-365.
[7] 宋敏,金贵.规划管制背景下差别化耕地保护生态补偿研究:回顾与展望[J].农业经济问题,2019(12):77-85.
[8] 马爱慧,蔡银莺,张安录. 耕地生态补偿实践与研究进展[J].生态学报,2011,13(8):2321-2330.
[9] 曾庆敏,陈利根,龙开胜.我国耕地生态补偿实施的制度环境评价[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(5):113-120.
[10] Schomers S, Matzdorf B. Payments for Ecosystem Services:A Review and Comparison of Developing and Industrialized Countries[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 6:16-30.
[11] Rodríguez-Robayo K J, Merino-Perez L. Contextualizing Context in the Analysis of Payment for Ecosystem Services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 23:259-267.
[12] 张广辉,方达.农村土地三权分置与新型农业经营主体培育[J].经济学家,2018(2):80-87.
[13] 李宁,张然,仇童伟,等.农地产权变迁中的结构细分与"三权分置"改革[J].经济学家,2017(1):62-69.
[14] 张红宇.农地改革:从"两权分离"到"三权分置"[J]. 中国经济报告,2018(12):37-39.
[15] 孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱."三权"分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(1):2-11.
[16] 李长健,杨莲芳.三权分置、农地流转及其风险防范[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):49-55.
[17] 冯淑怡,樊鹏飞,张兰. 乡村振兴背景下农地经营权的法律化表达[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(5):1-10.
[18] 洪银兴,王荣.农地"三权分置"背景下的土地流转研究[J].管理世界,2019(10):113-119.
[19] 周敏,胡碧霞,张阳.三权分置、农业补贴争夺与农业经营激励——吉林省J村玉米生产补贴分配博弈[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):61-68.
[20] 范业婷,金晓斌,项晓敏,等.苏南地区耕地多功能评价与空间特征分析[J].资源科学,2018(5):980-992.
[21] 郭庆海.农业供给侧结构性改革:内涵、目标与路径[J].世界农业,2017(3):227-230.
[22] 吴萍."三权分置"与耕地轮作休耕的实现[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2018(5):55-61.
[23] 陈利根,龙开胜. 新中国70年城乡土地制度演进逻辑、经验及改革建议[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(4):1-10.
[24] 龙开胜,赵亚莉,陈利根,等.生态地租视角下生态补偿及其土地利用变化效应研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2018:82-92.
[25] 张燕,王莎.耕地生态补偿标准制定进路选择——基于耕地生态安全视角[J].学习与实践,2017(2):21-28.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁亚荣,钟文颢.共享农庄土地利用法律问题研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(03):117.
　LIANG Yarong,ZHONG Wenhao.Study on the Legal Issues of Land Use on Shared Farms[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(05):117.
[2]孙新华,柳泽凡,周佩萱.“三权”分置中的地权整合与土地集中利用——以皖南河镇为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(01):2.
　SUN Xinhua,LIU Zefan,ZHOU Peixuan.Land Rights Integration in the “Three Rights” Separation and Centralized Use of Land: Evidence from River Town in the South of Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):2.
[3]彭开丽.“三权”分置背景下农户土地流转决策的形成机理与实证检验——基于湖北省672户农户的调研[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):116.
　PENG Kaili.Formation Mechanism and Empirical Study of Farmers’ Land Transfer Decision Under the Background of “Three Rights Separation”Policy: Evidence From Hubei Province with Survey of 672 Farmers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):116.
[4]单平基.分解、舍弃抑或改造:《民法典》编纂中土地承包经营权的定位[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(03):123.
　SHAN Pingji.Decompose, Abandon or Transform: The Orientation of Land Contractual Management Right in Civil Code[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):123.
[5]廖洪乐.农地“两权”分离和“三权”分置的经济学与法学逻辑[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):109.
　LIAO Hongle.Economical Logics and Jurisprudential Logics on Both Farmland’s Two Rights Division and Farmland’s Three Rights Separation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):109.
[6]刘国栋,蔡立东.农村宅基地权利制度的演进逻辑与未来走向[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(06):115.
　LIU Guodong,CAI Lidong.Rural Homestead Right System: Evolution Logics and Future Direction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(05):115.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-03-02。
基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“农地‘三权分置’下江苏耕地生态补偿利益均衡及实现路径选择研究”（19GLA004）；河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目“城乡接合部生态空间识别与评价研究”（2018B59114）；长三角乡村振兴发展咨询委托项目“长三角地区生态补偿实践比较与政策创新”（SKGL2019024）
作者简介:赵亚莉,女,河海大学公共管理学院讲师,博士;龙开胜,男,南京农业大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01