[1]饶芳萍,马贤磊,石晓平.土地产权安全性对生态友好型农业项目增收绩效的影响——以新疆林果套种项目为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(06):96-108.
　RAO Fangping,MA Xianlei,SHI Xiaoping.Impact of Land Tenure Security on Income Improvement Efficiency of Eco-friendly Agricultural Program: a Case Study on Crop-tree Intercroppingin Xinjiang[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):96-108.
点击复制

土地产权安全性对生态友好型农业项目增收绩效的影响——以新疆林果套种项目为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
16
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
96-108
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2016-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Land Tenure Security on Income Improvement Efficiency of Eco-friendly Agricultural Program: a Case Study on Crop-tree Intercroppingin Xinjiang
作者:
饶芳萍;  马贤磊;  石晓平
南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 210095
Author(s):
RAO Fangping;  MA Xianlei;  SHI Xiaoping
关键词:
政策绩效; 农民收入; 土地产权安全性; 林果套种
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
林果套种是我国西部干旱半干旱地区典型的生态友好型农业增收项目，旨在推动农业向生产高效转型和增加农民收入，但农户的参与往往受到现实土地产权不安全的限制。本文利用新疆农户调查数据考察了不同土地产权安全性对农户林果套种决策以及参与主体种植收入的影响。研究表明：承包地产权越安全农户参与林果套种项目的积极性越大；荒地产权安全性水平相对更低，农户利用种树维护土地产权安全的动机更强，因而在产权不安全时越倾向于参与套种；由于现阶段我国农地产权安全整体性水平较低，不足以激发农户套种参与期间的生产积极性，加之传统作物收入减少、政府支持不足和果品市场滞后，项目推行未能产生明显的增收效应。为此，需结合项目推行所需的果品市场构建，尤其强化以提高产权安全性为导向的农地产权制度改革，完善项目推行的制度环境，提高补贴标准，以激化农户项目参与的积极性。
Abstract:
Intercropping is a classical eco-friendly agricultural development program widely existing in arid and semi-arid western regions, which aims to facilitate transforming agriculture towards a high efficiency sector and increasing farmers’ income. However, farmers’ participation is usually hindered by land tenure security on ground. This paper attempts to empirically examine the impact of land tenure security on households’ participation in intercropping and its average effects on participants’ cropping income based on household survey data in Xinjiang. Results show that farmers with higher level of con-tract land tenure security are more likely to adopt intercropping on contract land; while farmers with lower level of wasteland tenure security are more likely to participate intercropping on wasteland in order to enhance the tenure security in the context of relatively lower level of tenure security. It is also found that the implementation of intercropping fails to bring significant increase of crop income among partici-pants due to the lack of investment incentives induced by insufficient tenure security, lowered traditional crop income, the lack of governmental support and undeveloped fruit market. Therefore, it is necessary to construct fruit relevant market. More importantly, it is of crucial significance to conduct the tenure security enhancement-oriented tenure reform to create sufficient institutional environments for in-tercropping. Lastly, it is also significant to increase subsidy to induce farmers’ participation enthusi-asms.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曲福田,石晓平,马贤磊,等.农村发展中土地资源保护机制[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2014:1-12.
[2] 封志明,李香莲.耕地与粮食安全战略:藏粮于土,提高中国土地资源的综合生产能力[J]. 地理学与国土研究,2000(16):1-5.
[3] 陈印军,王晋臣,肖碧林,等.我国耕地质量变化态势分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2011(32):1-5.
[4] 方迎风,童光荣,邹薇.公共资本、私人投资与区域性贫困陷阱[J]. 经济评论,2015(5):70-83.
[5] Lacombe S, Bradley R L, Hamel C, et al. Do Tree-based Intercropping Systems Increase the Diversity and Stability of Soil Microbial Communities?[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2009,131:25-31.
[6] Knorzer H, Graeff-Honninger S, Guo B, et al. The Rediscovery of Intercropping in China:A Traditional Cropping System for Future Chinese Agriculture-A Review, in Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial[M]. Germany:Springer,2009:13-44.
[7] Spoor M, Shi X, Pu C. Shifting Livelihood Strategies of Small Cotton Farmers in Southern Xinjiang[M]. Germany:Shaker Verlag,2010:221-240.
[8] Banerjee A V, Ghatak M. Eviction Threats and Investment Incentives[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2004,74(2):469-488.
[9] Carter M R, Olinto P. Getting Institutions "Right" for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2003,85(1):173-186.
[10] Jerneck A, Olsson L. More than Trees! Understanding the Agroforestry Adoption Gap in Subsistence Agriculture:Insights from Narrative Walks in Kenya[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2013,32(4):114-125.
[11] Lee D R. Agricultural Sustainability and Technology Adoption:Issues and Policies for Developing Countries[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2005,87(5):1325-1334.
[12] Pattanayak S K, Mercer D E, Sills E, et al. Taking Stock of Agroforestry Adoption Studies[J]. Agroforestry Systems,2003,57(3):173-186.
[13] Tenge A J, Kalumuna M C, Shisanya C A. Social and Economic Factors for the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in Lake Victoria Catchment[M]. Netherlands:Springer,2011:1345-1352.
[14] Nkamleu G B, Manyong V M. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices by Farmers in Cameroon[J]. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy,2005,4(2):135-148.
[15] Rao F, Spoor M, Ma X,et al. Land Tenure (in) Security and Crop-tree Intercropping in Rural Xinjiang, China[J]. Land Use Policy,2016,50:102-114.
[16] 刘璨,林海燕.林业重点工程对农民收入流动的影响研究[J].中国软科学,2011(1):34-46.
[17] 刘璨,张巍.退耕还林政策选择与农户收入的影响:以我国京津风沙治理工程为例[J]. 经济学(季刊),2006(6):273-290.
[18] 徐晋涛,陶然,徐志刚.退耕还林:成本有效性、结构调整效应与经济可持续性:基于西部三省农户调查的实证分析[J]. 经济学(季刊),2004(4):139-162.
[19] Ma X, Heerink N, Ierland E, et al. Land Tenure Insecurity and Rural-Urban Migration in Rural China[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2014,95(2):383-406.
[20] Feder G, Nishio A. The Benefits of Land Registration and Titling:Economic and Social Perspectives[J]. Land Use Policy,1998,15(1):25-43.
[21] Ma X. Does Tenure Security Matter? Rural Household Responses to Land Tenure Reforms in Northwest China[D]. Wageningen, The Netherlands:Wageningen University, 2013. http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/2044163.
[22] Ma X, Heerink N, Feng S,et al. Farmland Tenure in China:Comparing Legal, Actual and Perceived security[J]. Land Use Policy,2015,42:293-306.
[23] Van-Gelder J L. What Tenure Security? The Case for a Tripartite View[J]. Land Use Policy,2010,27(2):449-456.
[24] Sjaastad E, Bromley D W. The Prejudices of Property Rights:On Individualism, Specificity, and Security in Property Regimes[J]. Development Policy Review,2000,18(4):365-389.
[25] Brasselle A S, Gaspart F, Platteau J P. Land Tenure Security and Investment Incentives:Puzzling Evidence from Burkina Faso[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2002,67(2):373-418.
[26] 叶剑平,丰雷,蒋妍.2008年中国农村土地使用权调查研究[J]. 管理世界,2010(1):64-72.
[27] Arsel M, Dasgupta A. Structural Change, Land Use and the State in China:Making Sense of Three Divergent Processes[J]. European Journal of Development Research,2013,25(1):92-111.
[28] Franzel S, Coe R, Cooper P, et al. Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Sub-saharan Africa[J]. Agricultural Systems,2001,69(1):37-62.
[29] Lacombe S, Bradley R L, Hamel C, et al. Do Tree-based Intercropping Systems Increase the Diversity and Stability of Soil Microbial Communities?[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2009,131(1):25-31.
[30] Mercer D E. Adoption of Agroforestry Innovations in the Tropics:a Review[J]. Agroforestry Systems,2004, 61(3):311-328.
[31] Toor I A, Smith E G, Whalen J K, et al. Tree-based Intercropping in Southern Ontario, Canada[J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics,2012,60(2):141-154.
[32] Deininger K, Jin S. Tenure Security and Land-related Investment:Evidence from Ethiopia[J]. European Economic Review,2006,50(5):1245-1277.
[33] Deininger K, Jin S. The Impact of Property Rights on Households’ investment, Risk Coping, and Policy Preferences:Evidence from China[J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,2003,51(4):851-882.
[34] Li Q, Chen Y, Shen Y,et al. Spatial and Temporal Trends of Climate Change in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2011,21(6):1007-1018.
[35] 刘军,朱美玲,贺诚.新疆棉花节水技术灌溉用水效率与影响因素分析[J]. 干旱区域资源与环境,2015(2):115-121.
[36] Heckman J, Ichimura H, Todd P E. Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator:Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1997,64(4):605-654.
[37] Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys,2008,22(1):31-72.
[38] Lanza S T, Moore J E, Butera N M. Drawing Causal Inferences Using Propensity Scores:A Practical Guide for Community Psychologists[J]. American Journal of Community Psychology,2013,52(3-4):380-392.
[39] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using sub-classification on the Propensity Score[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association,1984,79:516-524.
[40] Villano R, Bravo-Ureta B, Solis D, et al. Modern Rice Technologies and Productivity in the Philippines:Disentangling Technology from Managerial Gaps[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2015,66(1):129-154.
[41] Wooldridge J M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2010:561-635.
[42] Jansen K, Roquas E. Modernizing Insecurity:the Land Titling Project in Honduras[J]. Development and Change,1998,29(1):81-106.
[43] Ma X, Heerink N, Van-Ierland E, et al. Land Tenure Security and Land Investments in Northwest China[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review,2013,5(2):281-307.

相似文献/References:

[1]龙开胜.集体建设用地指标交易能否增加农民收入——一个整体性框架及初步经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(05):87.
　LONG Kaisheng.Does Collective Construction Land Quota Transaction Increase Peasants’ Income? An Integrated Framework and Preliminary Empirical Evidences[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(06):87.
[2]许秀川,温涛,张卫国.耕地面积、劳动供给、工资水平与城镇化的非线性关系——一个理论模型及其门槛面板数据的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(03):101.
　XU Xiuchuan,WEN Tao,ZHANG Weiguo.Farming Area, Labor Supply and Wage’s Non-Linear Relationship with Urbanization in China: A Theory Model and Its Empirical Analysis Via Threshold Panel Data Method[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):101.
[3]胡祎,魏后凯.中国农村老年人的收入结构与收入不平等——兼论中国农村居民的养老现状[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(04):45.
　HU Yi,WEI Houkai.Income Structure and Income Inequality of the Elderly in Rural China: The Present Situation of the Elderly in Rural China[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(06):45.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-04-29。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目“农业劳动力迁移、村级基层治理对水土资源利用效率的影响研究：基于甘肃、新疆和江西农户和村庄层面的分析”（71573134）；国家自然科学基金项目“农地流转模式、流转契约与农业规模经营模式组合：驱动力、绩效与机制设计”（71373127）；国家自然科学基金项目“农村土地制度与资源配置”（71322301）
作者简介:饶芳萍,女,南京农业大学公共管理学院博士后,E-mail:raofp04@126.com。
通讯作者:石晓平,男
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01