[1]诸培新,苏敏,颜杰.转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响——以江苏四县（市）水稻生产为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(04):85-94.
　ZHU Peixin,SU Min,YAN Jie.Impact of Farmland Scale and Stability on Fertilizer Input: Taking Rice Production of Four Counties of Jiangsu Province as Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):85-94.
点击复制

转入农地经营规模及稳定性对农户化肥投入的影响——以江苏四县（市）水稻生产为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
85-94
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2017-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Farmland Scale and Stability on Fertilizer Input: Taking Rice Production of Four Counties of Jiangsu Province as Example
作者:
诸培新;  苏敏;  颜杰
南京农业大学 公共管理学院, 江苏 南京 210095
Author(s):
ZHU Peixin;  SU Min;  YAN Jie
关键词:
农地流转; 经营规模; 经营权稳定性; 水稻生产; 化肥投入
分类号:
F301.24
摘要:
论文系统分析了转入农地的经营规模和转入农地的经营权稳定性差异对转入农户化肥投入的影响和作用机理，以江苏四县（市）191户农地转入户水稻生产的问卷调查为基础，运用OLS和Tobit回归方法进行检验。结果显示，转入农地的经营规模对转入农户水稻生产中化肥亩均投入存在显著负向影响；转入农户个体特征中户主受教育年限对水稻生产中化肥亩均投入影响为负；确定的流转期限对转入农户水稻生产中化肥亩均投入有显著负向影响。基于以上结论的政策启示为：（1）鼓励农地流转实现适度规模经营，发挥化肥使用的规模效应，减少化肥投入；（2）发挥政府引导、服务和公信作用，规范农户农地流转行为，稳定转入户的农地流转经营权，降低农户肥料使用中的短期行为；（3）响应家庭农场、种植大户等新型农业经营主体的需求，针对性地开展环境友好型的技术推广服务，减少化肥投入的同时提高水稻产量和品质。
Abstract:
This paper systematically described the impact mechanism of rented farmland scale and its use tenure stability on fertilizer input which are affected by land transfer. Based on the questionnaire survey of 191 respondents in four counties of Jiangsu Province, and using the general linear model regression and Tobit Model Regression to test the hypothesis, our estimation results showed that: farmland’s scale has a significant negative impact on fertilizer input, and the head of household’s education level has a significant negative impact on fertilizer input, while the training level of the head of household on agricultural techniques has no obvious influence, and definite lease term has a significant negative impact on the fertilizer input. From these conclusions, our suggestions are continuing to encourage land tenancy to achieve the land-scale operation and to give full play the scale use of fertilizers, thus reducing fertilizer input. Government should provide guidance, service and credibility to regulate the farmers’ farmland transfer behavior and to improve farmland’s use tenure stability, thus reducing the short-term behavior in their agricultural production. Government should be responsive to the needs of new agricultural business entities, and promote the awareness campaigns of environmentally friendly technologies and services to reduce fertilizer input and to increase crop yield of farmland and to improve the quality of crop at the same time.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中国农业部. 国务院关于稳定和完善农村土地承包关系情况的报告[R]. 2015.
[2] 刘守英,李青,王瑞民. 中国农村土地流转和规模经营的特征与变化趋势[R].调查研究报告, 2015,172号(总4857号).
[3] 国家环境保护总局. 2013年中国环境状况公报[R].2014.
[4] 向涛,綦勇. 粮食安全与农业面源污染——以农地禀赋对化肥投入强度的影响为例[J]. 财经研究, 2015, 41(7):132-144.
[5] 巩前文,田志宏. 农村经济发展与化肥使用量的库兹涅茨曲线假说及验证[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 27(4):157-164.
[6] 蔡荣. 合同生产模式与农户肥料施用结构——基于山东省苹果种植农户调查数据的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2011(3):41-51.
[7] 栾江,仇焕广,井月,等. 我国化肥施用量持续增长的原因分解及趋势预测[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013(11):1869-1878.
[8] 郑鑫. 丹江口库区农户氮肥施用强度的影响因素分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010(5):75-79.
[9] 杨钢桥,靳艳艳. 农地流转对农户农地投入影响的区域比较——基于江汉平原和太湖平原的实证分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010(10):164-168.
[10] 何凌云,黄季焜. 土地使用权的稳定性与肥料使用——广东省实证研究[J]. 中国农村观察,2001(5):42-48,81.
[11] 王敏,诸培新,张建. 农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 16(4):81-89.
[12] Abdulai A, Owusu V, Goetz R. Land Tenure Differences and Investment in Land Improvement Measures: The Oretical and Empirical Analyses[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2011, 96(1):66-78.
[13] Benjamin D, Brandt L. Property Rights, Labour Markets, and Efficiency in a Transition Economy: the Case of Rural China[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics/revue Canadienne D’economique, 2002, 35(4):689-716.
[14] 史清华. 中国农家行为研究[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2009.
[15] 郜亮亮,黄季焜, Rozelle,等. 中国农地流转市场的发展及其对农户投资的影响[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011(3):1499-1514.
[16] 郜亮亮,黄季焜. 不同类型流转农地与农户投资的关系分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2011(4):9-17.
[17] 杨钢桥,靳艳艳,杨俊. 农地流转对不同类型农户农地投入行为的影响——基于江汉平原和太湖平原的实证分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010(9):18-23.
[18] 华春林,陆迁,姜雅莉,等. 农业教育培训项目对减少农业面源污染的影响效果研究——基于倾向评分匹配方法[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013(4):83-92.
[19] 洪名勇,龚丽娟,洪霓. 农地流转农户契约选择及机制的实证研究——来自贵州省三个县的经验证据[J]. 中国土地科学, 2016(3):12-19.

相似文献/References:

[1]马流辉.农地福利化：实践机制、后果呈现及其优化路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(06):66.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(04):66.
[2]夏柱智.虚拟确权：农地流转制度创新[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(06):89.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(04):89.
[3]朱建军,胡继连.农地流转对我国农民收入分配的影响研究——基于中国健康与养老追踪调查数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(03):75.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(04):75.
[4]付江涛,纪月清,胡浩.新一轮承包地确权登记颁证是否促进了农户的土地流转--来自江苏省3县(市、区)的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(01):105.
　FU Jiangtao,JI Yueqing,HU Hao.Does New-Round Land Confirmation, Registration and Certification Boost the Land Transfer among Farmers? An Empirical Evidence from 3 Counties in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):105.
[5]侯建昀,霍学喜.专业化农户农地流转行为的实证分析——基于苹果种植户的微观证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(02):93.
　HOU Jianyun,HUO Xuexi.Empirical Analysis of Land Lease Market Economic Effect: The Micro Evidence from Apple Growers[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):93.
[6]王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):81.
　WANG Min,ZHU Peixin,ZHANG Jian.How Farmland Circulation Affects Farmers’ Willingness to Homestead Exit: Based on a Survey of 855 Farmer Households in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):81.
[7]杨玉珍.我国农地制度“被建构”与“被执行”的冲突——以土地承包经营权流转为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(06):77.
　YANG Yuzhen.China??s Rural Land Property System Conflicts Between Being Constructed and Being Executed: Taking Land Contractual Management Right Transfer as Case[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):77.
[8]黄惠春,徐章星,祁艳.农地流转与规模化经营缓解了农户信贷约束吗?——来自江苏的经验证据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(06):109.
　Huang Huichun,Xu Zhangxing,Qi Yan.Did Rural Land Circulation and Scale-land Management Decrease Credit Constraint on Rural Households? Evidences from Case of Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(04):109.
[9]张建,王敏,诸培新.农地流转政策执行偏差与农民土地权益保护——以江苏省某传统农业大县S县为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):82.
　ZHANG Jian,WANG Min,ZHU Peixin.Deviation of Policy Implementation in Farmland Transfer and Farmers’ Land Rights and Interests Protection: Taking a Traditional Agricultural County in Jiangsu Province as a Case[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):82.
[10]吕晓,臧涛,张全景.土地政策的农户认知及其农地转出响应研究——基于山东省287份农户问卷调查的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(05):100.
　LV Xiao,ZANG Tao,ZHANG Quanjing.Farm Households’Cognition of Land Policy and Its Effect on Farmland Transfer:Based on the Investigation of 287 Farmer Households in Shandong Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(04):100.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-12-27。
基金项目:教育部博士点基金项目"政府主导下农地流转对农户收入分化影响研究：作用机制与政策调控"（20130097110037）；国家自然科学基金项目"政府主导下农地流转对农户收入不平等影响研究：作用机制与政策调控"（71373128）
作者简介:诸培新,男,南京农业大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。E-mail:zpx@njau.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20