[1]王静,赵凯.宅基地退出、要素配置与农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):151-163.
　WANG Jing,ZHAO Kai.Agricultural Enterprises’ Vertical Integration Contract Mode Selection and Dynamic Evolution:Case Analysis Based on the Pig Breeding Industry[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(03):151-163.
点击复制

宅基地退出、要素配置与农户农业生产效率()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
151-163
栏目:
农业经济
出版日期:
2022-07-16

文章信息/Info

Title:
Agricultural Enterprises’ Vertical Integration Contract Mode Selection and Dynamic Evolution:Case Analysis Based on the Pig Breeding Industry
作者:
王静;  赵凯
西北农林科技大学 经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
WANG Jing;  ZHAO Kai
关键词:
宅基地退出; 农业生产效率; 要素配置; 农户; 中介效应
Keywords:
Homestead Exit; Agricultural Production Efficiency; Factor Allocation; Farmers; Mediating Effect Test
分类号:
F301.2
摘要:
结合安徽省金寨县473份农户调研数据,采用中介效应检验方法探讨宅基地退出、要素配置对农户农业生产效率的影响机制,同时考察宅基地退出对不同年龄阶段农户农业生产效率的影响差异。研究发现:宅基地退出对农户农业生产效率具有显著负向影响,采用工具变量法纠正内生性问题后,其负向影响仍显著。要素配置在宅基地退出影响农户农业生产效率中发挥中介效应,总中介效应占比为29.07%;宅基地退出能够通过促进农户农地规模缩减、减少劳动力投入、增加资金投入对其农业生产效率产生间接负向影响。对于高龄农业劳动力,宅基地退出负向影响其农业生产效率,且通过增加资金投入对其农业生产效率产生间接负向影响;对于低龄农业劳动力,宅基地退出负向影响其农业生产效率,且通过促进农地规模缩减、减少劳动力投入对其农业生产效率产生间接负向影响。最后,提出建立健全农地流转市场、不断完善宅基地退出后续帮扶政策、持续推进社会化服务市场建设等建议。
Abstract:
Constructed a theoretical analysis framework for the selection and evolution of contract models for agricultural enterprises, selected multiple cases of pig breeding enterprises, this paper discussed how transaction costs play a role in agricultural enterprises’ vertical integration, and introduced the theory of incomplete contracts to analyze the path and logic of the adaptive evolution of the contract between enterprises and farmers. The study found that each agriculture contract of animal husbandry enterprises in the breeding process is a rational choice made by weighing external market transaction costs and internal production costs under given transaction attributes. There are different optimal contract modes for different production links or varieties. Due to the incompleteness of the contract, there is an adaptive adjustment process in the leading enterprises’ contract selection. The impact of the African Swine Fever epidemic or environmental regulations will reduce the efficiency of contract performance. Enterprises will adjust the original single contract model and transition to an intermediate contract or a hybrid contract model with more closely linked interests. Therefore, appropriate forms of agricultural contracts should be selected according to local conditions, and farmers and enterprises should be encouraged to make complementary and dedicated investments, so as to enhance the stability of the contract on both sides.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈小君,蒋省三.宅基地使用权制度:规范解析、实践挑战及其立法回应[J].管理世界,2010(10):1-12.
[2] 龚宏龄.农户宅基地退出意愿研究——基于宅基地不同持有情况的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(11):89-99,112.
[3] 胡银根,杨春梅,董文静,等.基于感知价值理论的农户宅基地有偿退出决策行为研究——以安徽省金寨县典型试点区为例[J].资源科学,2020,42(4):685-695.
[4] 孙鹏飞,高原,赵凯.宅基地退出对农户收入的影响——基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的反事实估计[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(2):69-78.
[5] 杨玉珍.农户闲置宅基地退出的影响因素及政策衔接——行为经济学视角[J].经济地理,2015,35(7):140-147.
[6] 张建,诸培新.不同农地流转模式对农业生产效率的影响分析——以江苏省四县为例[J].资源科学,2017,39(4):629-640.
[7] 李欢,张安录.农村宅基地退出前后农户福利测度及其动态变化——以浙江省德清县201户农户为例[J].农业技术经济,2019(7):79-90.
[8] 孙鹏飞,赵凯,周升强,等.风险预期、社会网络与农户宅基地退出——基于安徽省金寨县626户农户样本[J].中国土地科学,2019,33(4):42-50.
[9] 孙鹏飞,张仁慧,赵凯.宅基地退出加剧了农村劳动力非农转移吗?——来自安徽省金寨县农户的证据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(2):65-72.
[10] 张勇,包婷婷.农村宅基地退出的驱动力分析——基于推拉理论视角[J].农村经济,2017(4):18-23.
[11] 徐绍史.加强和改善土地宏观调控构建科学发展新机制[J].求是,2010(3):34-36.
[12] 韩冬,韩立达,张勰,等.市场化视角下农村宅基地有偿退出研究[J].农业现代化研究,2018,39(1):19-27.
[13] 胡银根,王聪,廖成泉,等.不同治理结构下农村宅基地有偿退出模式探析——以金寨、蓟州、义乌3个典型试点为例[J].资源开发与市场,2017,33(12):1411-1416.
[14] 王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):81-89,157.
[15] 曾琦,杨耀淇.压煤村庄搬迁对农业生产的影响——以兖州市为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(2):102-108.
[16] 谢先雄,赵敏娟,蔡瑜,等.农地休耕如何影响农户收入?——基于西北休耕试点区1240个农户面板数据的实证[J].中国农村经济,2020(11):62-78.
[17] 盖庆恩,朱喜,程名望,等.土地资源配置不当与劳动生产率[J].经济研究,2017,52(5):117-130.
[18] Latruffe L, Piet L. Does Land Fragmentation Affect Farm Performance?A Case Study From Brittany[R]. Factor Markets Working Papers,2013:68-80.
[19] Damon A L. Agricultural Land Use and Asset Accumulation in Migrant Households:The Case of ElSalvador[J]. Journal of Development Studies,2010,46(1):162-189.
[20] 耿鹏鹏."规模实现"抑或"技术耗散":地权稳定如何影响农户农业生产效率[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(1):108-120.
[21] 林文声,王志刚,王美阳.农地确权、要素配置与农业生产效率——基于中国劳动力动态调查的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):64-82.
[22] 毕雪昊,周佳宁,邹伟.家庭劳动力约束下经营规模对农户种植结构选择的影响[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(12):68-77.
[23] Battese G E, Nazli H, Smale M. Factors Influencing the Productivity and Efficiency of Wheat Farmers in Punjab, Pakistan[J]. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing&Emerging Economies,2017,7(2):82-98.
[24] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1978,2(6):429-444.
[25] 黄志刚,黎洁.乡村旅游征地对失地农户福祉的影响——基于PSM模型的检验[J].资源科学,2021,43(1):171-184.
[26] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations[J]. Chapman and Hall,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[27] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[28] Fritz M S, Mackinnon D P. Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect[J]. Psychological Science,2007,18(3):233-239.
[29] Mackinnon D P. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,2008:64.
[30] Preacher K J, Hayes A F. Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models[J].Behav Res Methods,2008,40(3):879-891.

相似文献/References:

[1]王敏,诸培新,张建.农地流转对农户宅基地退出意愿影响研究——基于江苏省855户农户的调查结果分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):81.
　WANG Min,ZHU Peixin,ZHANG Jian.How Farmland Circulation Affects Farmers’ Willingness to Homestead Exit: Based on a Survey of 855 Farmer Households in Jiangsu Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(03):81.
[2]孙鹏飞,赵凯.社会资本对农户宅基地退出行为的影响——基于安徽省金寨县的调研数据[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(05):128.
　SUN Pengfei,ZHAO Kai.Effect of Social Capital on Farmers’ Behavior of Quitting Rural Residential Land: A Case of 606 Farmers’ Samples in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):128.
[3]张慧利,夏显力.农村劳动力流动如何影响农户宅基地退出行为？[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(01):139.
　ZHANG Huili,XIA Xianli.How Does Rural Labor Mobility Affect Farmers’ Homestead Withdrawal?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(03):139.
[4]高原,高晨曦,赵凯.宅基地退出对农户家庭消费的影响——基于家庭人口结构的调节作用[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(04):139.
　GAO Yuan,GAO Chenxi,ZHAO Kai.The Impact of Homestead Exit on Household Consumption: Based on the Moderating Effect of Household Population Composition[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(03):139.
[5]孙鹏飞,尚丽娟,周升强.宅基地退出对农户子女教育获得的影响——基于安徽金寨县和四川邛崃市农户的调查[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):160.
　SUN Pengfei,SHANG Lijuan,ZHOU Shengqiang.Does the Behavior of Quitting Rural Residential Land Help Improve the Education Access of Farmers’ Children: Based on the Survey of Farmers in Jinzhai County, Anhui Province and Qionglai City, Sichuan Province[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(03):160.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-07-12。
基金项目:农业农村部农村合作经济指导司委托课题"农村宅基地指导改革试点管理与评估"(10200071);陕西省社会科学基金项目"陕西新型农业社会化服务体系构建研究"(2020R037)
作者简介:王静,女,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院博士生
通讯作者:赵凯(通信作者),男,西北农林科技大学经济管理学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01