[1]沈费伟,马瑗.因地制宜推进数字乡村高质量发展[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2025,25(02):88-100.
　SHEN Feiwei,MA Yuan.Research on Promoting High-quality Development of Digital Rural Areas According to Local Conditions[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2025,25(02):88-100.
点击复制

因地制宜推进数字乡村高质量发展()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
25
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
88-100
栏目:
农民生计与保障
出版日期:
2025-04-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Promoting High-quality Development of Digital Rural Areas According to Local Conditions
作者:
沈费伟;  马瑗
杭州师范大学 公共管理学院, 杭州 311121
Author(s):
SHEN Feiwei;  MA Yuan
关键词:
因地制宜; 数字乡村; 适应性治理; 乡村治理; 乡村振兴; 高质量发展
Keywords:
Adaptation to Local Condition; Digital Countryside; Adaptive Governance; Rural Governance; Rural Revitalization; High Quality Development
分类号:
F303.3
摘要:
数字乡村治理在促进乡村振兴绩效的同时,也面临着同质化建设的现实问题。以适应性治理为理论基础,从多元主体合作、遵循地方知识、弹性制度设计、健全反馈机制四个维度,构建数字乡村高质量发展的优化路径。研究发现,数字乡村适应性治理遵循着项目统筹规划、企业规范运营、数据共享开放、安全能力提升、建设成果普惠的实践逻辑,这实则反映了乡村自协调、自组织、自发展、自适应的内在机理。尽管当前数字乡村治理取得了重要成效,但也出现了适应性不足的现实困境,具体表现为参与主体碎片化、数字思维简单化、政策执行模式化以及反馈体系机械化。基于此,未来需要在主体层面实现合作参与、多元协同,在思维层面实现内生发展、精准供给,在政策层面实现差异化执行、因地制宜,在反馈层面实现机制健全、保障村民合法权益,以更好地促进数字乡村治理绩效,真正实现乡村振兴目标。
Abstract:
In recent years, as the performance of rural revitalization has been advanced, digital rural governance has encountered the practical challenge of uniform construction. Utilizing adaptive governance as an analytical framework, this paper endeavors to establish an optimization pathway for the high-quality development of digital rural areas across four dimensions: multi-stakeholder collaboration, leveraging local knowledge, flexible institutional design, and robust feedback mechanisms. The study reveals that the adaptive governance of digital villages adheres to a practical logic that encompasses project coordination and planning, standardized enterprise operations, data sharing and openness, enhanced security capabilities, and universally beneficial construction outcomes. These aspects, in essence, reflect the intrinsic mechanisms of self-coordination, self-organization, self-development, and self-adaptation within villages. Although current digital rural governance has yielded significant achievements, the reality of its limited adaptability presents a dilemma, particularly evident in the fragmentation of participating subjects, digital mindset limitations, simplistic policy implementation approaches, and a mechanized feedback system. In light of this, the future direction should focus on achieving cooperative participation and multi-stakeholder synergy at the subject level, fostering endogenous development and precise supply at the conceptual level, implementing differentiated strategies and local adaptation at the policy level, and establishing comprehensive mechanisms to protect the legitimate rights and interests of villagers at the feedback level. This approach will more effectively enhance the efficacy of digital rural governance and genuinely realize the objectives of rural revitalization.

参考文献/References:

[1] 沈费伟,叶温馨.数字乡村发展的实现路径考察——基于精明增长理论的探索[J].人文杂志,2022(4):69-80.
[2] 沈费伟.数字乡村标准化治理的现实困境与优化路径[J].河南社会科学,2024(5):85-95.
[3] 郑永兰,周其鑫.内外耦合式发展:数字乡村建设的策略选择[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):43-52.
[4] 沈费伟.数字乡村的内生发展模式:实践逻辑、运作机理与优化策略[J].电子政务,2021(10):57-67.
[5] 陈潭,王鹏.信息鸿沟与数字乡村建设的实践症候[J].电子政务,2020(12):2-12.
[6] 方堃,李帆,金铭.基于整体性治理的数字乡村公共服务体系研究[J].电子政务,2019(11):72-81.
[7] 沈费伟,杜芳.数字乡村治理的限度与优化策略——基于治理现代化视角的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(4):134-144.
[8] 赵早.乡村治理模式转型与数字乡村治理体系构建[J].领导科学,2020(14):45-48.
[9] 秦秋霞 郭红东,曾亿武.乡村振兴中的数字赋能及实现途径[J].江苏大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5):22-33.
[10] 杨嵘均,操远芃.论乡村数字赋能与数字鸿沟间的张力及其消解[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5): 31-40.
[11] Smit B,Wandel J.Adaptation,Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability[J].Global Environmental Change,2006(3): 282-292.
[12] O’Brien M J,Holland T D. The Role of Adaptation in Archaeological Explanation[J].American Antiquity,1992(1): 36-59.
[13] Dietz T,Ostrom E, Stern P C. The Struggle to Govern the Commons[J].Science, 2003,302: 1907-1912.
[14] Folke C,Carpenter S R,Walker B, et al. Resilience Thinking:Integrating Resilience,Adaptability and Transformability[J].Ecology and Society,2010(4):20.
[15] Lebel L,Anderies J M,Campbell B, et al. Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-ecological Systems[J].Ecology and Society,2006(1):19.
[16] Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T. Social-ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: The Development of Adaptive Co-management of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden[J].Ecology and Society,2004(4):2.
[17] 张克中.公共治理之道:埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆理论述评[J].政治学研究,2009(6):83-93.
[18] 郝玉章,风笑天.三峡外迁移民的社会适应性及其影响因素研究——对江苏227户移民的调查[J].市场与人口分析,2005(6): 62-67.
[19] 宋爽,王帅,傅伯杰,等. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2019(11):2401-2410.
[20] 刘慧.弹性治理:全球治理的新议程[J].国外社会科学,2017(5):17-25.
[21] 卡蓝默·皮埃尔,弗雷斯·让,加朗多·瓦莱里,等.破碎的民主:试论治理的革命[M].高凌瀚,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005:95.
[22] 塞缪尔·亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华,刘为,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2021:1.
[23] 韩瑞波.技术治理驱动的数字乡村建设及其有效性分析[J].内蒙古社会科学,2021(3): 16-23.
[24] 廖成中,翟坤周,毛磊.数字乡村建设的"数据治理"驱动:功能、场景及路径[J].改革,2023(12):113-127.
[25] 沈费伟.数字乡村敏捷治理的实践逻辑与优化路径[J].求实,2022(5):96-108.
[26] 曾亿武,宋逸香,林夏珍,等.中国数字乡村建设若干问题刍议[J].中国农村经济,2021(4):21-35.
[27] 西奥多·舒尔茨.改造传统农业[M].梁小民,译.北京:商务印书馆,2017:6-7.
[28] Perri L D,Seltzer K,Stoker G.Towards Holistic Governance:The New Reform Agenda[M].London:Palgrave,2002:88.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨嵘均,操远芃.论乡村数字赋能与数字鸿沟间的张力及其消解[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):31.
　YANG Rongjun,CAO Yuanpeng.On the Tension between Rural Digital Empowerment and Digital Divide and Its Resolution[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):31.
[2]沈费伟,叶温馨.数字乡村建设:实现高质量乡村振兴的策略选择[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(05):41.
　SHEN Feiwei,YE Wenxin.Digital Rural Construction: A Strategic Choice to Realize the Revitalization of High-quality Rural Areas[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):41.
[3]沈费伟,杜芳.数字乡村治理的限度与优化策略——基于治理现代化视角的考察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(04):134.
　SHEN Feiwei,DU Fang.Governance Limits and Optimization Strategies of Digital Countryside: From the Perspective of Governance Modernization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):134.
[4]沈费伟,崔钰.数字乡村治理何以提升社会质量——基于社会质量理论的阐述[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(03):95.
　SHEN Feiwei,CUI Yu.How Can Digital Countryside Governance Improve Social Quality: Based on the Interpretation of Social Quality Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(02):95.
[5]朱战辉.数字乡村建设背景下乡村精英再造与治理机制分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(06):126.
　ZHU Zhanhui.Analysis of the Reconstruction of Rural Elites and Governance Mechanisms in the Context of the Digital Rural Construction[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(02):126.
[6]沈费伟,胡紫依.乡村数字弱势群体能力贫困的内生原因与解决对策——基于森的“可行能力”理论探讨[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2024,24(02):112.
　SHEN Feiwei,HU Ziyi.The External Cause and Solution Measures of Capability Poverty of Rural Digital Vulnerable Groups: Based on Sen’s Theory of "Feasible Ability"[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2024,24(02):112.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-6-26。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目"数字乡村标准化建设的绩效评价与提升策略研究"(24BZZ069)
作者简介:沈费伟,男,杭州师范大学公共管理学院副教授;马瑗,女,杭州师范大学公共管理学院硕士生。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01