[1]陈胜祥.农村宅基地“三权”分置：问题导向、分置逻辑与实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):147-158.
　CHEN Shengxiang.On the Separation of Three Rights of Rural Homestead Land: Problem Orientation, Separation Logic and Realization Path[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):147-158.
点击复制

农村宅基地“三权”分置：问题导向、分置逻辑与实现路径()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
147-158
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2022-03-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Separation of Three Rights of Rural Homestead Land: Problem Orientation, Separation Logic and Realization Path
作者:
陈胜祥
江西财经大学 旅游与城市管理学院, 江西 南昌 330013
Author(s):
CHEN Shengxiang
关键词:
宅基地; "三权"分置; 心理所有权; 实现路径
Keywords:
Homestead Land; Separation of Three Rights; Psychological Ownership; Realization Way
分类号:
F301.1
摘要:
运用质性和量化相结合的研究方法,系统分析了宅基地制度变迁中存在的问题,并以问题为导向,探索宅基地"三权"分置的逻辑及其实现路径。研究发现:(1)宅基地制度亟待解决的历史遗留问题有宅基地占用乱象丛生、农民产权观念扭曲和宅基地财产功能消失。(2)解决历史遗留问题的"三权"分置逻辑是:落实集体所有权以稳定资格权;引导农户生成心理所有权观念,为适度放活宅基地使用权和治理乱占滥用建立认知和行为基础。(3)实现路径是:一是在制度化表达中,将农户资格权界定为从集体所有权中分离出来的成员权,将原宅基地使用权界定为流转无碍的用益物权;二是落实集体所有权中的处分权、收益权和监管权,为农户资格权提供固化式保障,进而为适度放活宅基地使用权建立心理安全机制。由此得到新一轮试点改革实践的启示:一要以解决历史遗留问题为导向理解"三权"分置逻辑;二要以激活心理所有权为中介目标选择政策工具;三要从流转安全角度而非时空角度界定适度放活宅基地使用权中的"适度"概念。
Abstract:
This paper uses qualitative and quantitative hybrid research methods to systematically explore the historical problems that must be faced by the reform of the separation of the three powers, and explores the logic of the separation of the three powers and its realization path under the guidance of the problems. The research results are as follows:(1) As the rural homestead system evolves to the present, the historical problems that need to be solved urgently include the governance of unauthorized occupation and abuse, the activation of property functions and the reconstruction of the concept of property rights. (2) The logic of separation of the three rights, which is beneficial to solving the historical problems, is to stabilize the qualification right through the implementation of collective ownership, promote the formation of psychological ownership concept of farmers, and provide a cognitive and behavioral basis for moderately releasing the right to use rural homestead and controlling the misuse of occupation and abuse. (3) The realization path consistent with the separation logic are as follows:firstly, in the systematic expression, the peasant household qualification right should be defined as the member right separated from the collective ownership, and the use right of the original homestead should be defined as the usufructuary right which is free from circulation. Secondly, through the implementation of the right of disposal, the right of usufruct and the right of supervision in collective ownership, the right of peasant household qualification should be guaranteed, and the psychological security mechanism should be established for appropriately releasing the right to use the homestead. The policy suggestions are as follows:first, we should understand the logic of separation of the three powers in order to solve the problems left over from history. The second is to choose policy tools with the intermediary goal of activating psychological ownership. The third is to define the concept of "moderation" in the right to use the homestead from the perspective of circulation safety rather than time and space.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张克俊,付宗平.基于功能变迁的宅基地制度改革探索[J].社会科学研究,2017(6):47-53.
[2] 徐忠国,卓跃飞,吴次芳,等.农村宅基地三权分置的经济解释与法理演绎[J].中国土地科学,2018(8):16-22.
[3] 房建恩.乡村振兴背景下宅基地"三权分置"的功能检视与实现路径[J].中国土地科学,2019(5):23-29.
[4] 刘国栋,蔡立东.农村宅基地权利制度的演进逻辑与未来走向[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(6):115-124.
[5] 李丽,吕晓,张全景."三权分置"背景下宅基地使用权流转的法学视角再审视[J].中国土地科学,2020(3):16-23.
[6] 李怀,陈享光.乡村振兴背景下宅基地"三权分置"的权能实现与深化路径[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020(6):28-34.
[7] 孙彦.宅基地"三权分置"的产权性质与改革实施路径解析[J].制度经济学研究,2021(2):253-264.
[8] 姜楠.宅基地"三权"分置的法构造及其实现路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(3): 105-116,159.
[9] 程秀建.宅基地资格权的权属定位与法律制度供给[J].政治与法律, 2018(8): 29-41.
[10] 宋志红.宅基地"三权分置"的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018(4):142-153.
[11] 刘国栋.论宅基地三权分置政策中农户资格权的法律表达[J].法律科学,2019(1):192-200.
[12] 李琳,郭志京,张毅,等.宅基地"三权分置"的法律表达[J].中国土地科学,2019(7):19-25.
[13] 陈耀东.宅基地"三权分置"的法理解析与立法回应[J].广东社会科学,2019(1):223-230,256.
[14] 孙建伟.宅基地"三权分置"中资格权、使用权定性辨析——兼与席志国副教授商榷[J].政治与法律,2019(1):125-139.
[15] 陈奕青,张富利.宅基地"三权分置"的法律制度实现路径探讨[J].社科纵横,2020(7):99-106.
[16] 高海.宅基地"三权分置"的法实现[J].法学家,2019(4):132-144,195.
[17] 游斌,张军涛,于婷.城乡融合发展视角下宅基地"三权分置"实现形式研究[J].江汉学术,2021(6):13-22.
[18] 付宗平.乡村振兴框架下宅基地"三权分置"的内在要求与实现路径[J].农村经济, 2019(7): 26-33.
[19] 张克俊,付宗平."三权分置"下适度放活宅基地使用权探析[J].农业经济问题, 2020(5): 28-38.
[20] 曾旭晖,郭晓鸣.传统农区宅基地"三权分置"路径研究——基于江西省余江区和四川省泸县宅基地制度改革案例[J].农业经济问题, 2019(6): 58-66.
[21] 刘圣欢,杨砚池.农村宅基地"三权分置"的权利结构与实施路径——基于大理市银桥镇农村宅基地制度改革试点[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018(5): 45-54.
[22] 丁宇峰,付坚强.新中国土地政策演进视野下的宅基地"三权分置"制度选择[J].经济问题,2019(11):89-95.
[23] 凯西·卡麦兹.建构扎根理论: 质性研究实践指南[M].边国英,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:21.
[24] 爱伦·斯密德. 财产、权力和公共选择——对法和经济学的进一步思考[M].黄祖辉,蒋文华,郭红东,等译. 上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999.
[25] 林震岩.多变量分析——SPSS的操作与应用[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007:184-186.
[26] 伍多·库卡茨.质性文本分析:方法、实践与软件使用指南[M].朱志勇,范晓慧,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2017:73.
[27] 陈胜祥.中国农民土地产权幻觉研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015:77.
[28] 赵树枫.改革农村宅基地制度的理由与思路[J].理论前沿,2009(12):10-12,15.
[29] Pierce J L, Rubenfeld S A, Morgan S. Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects[J].Academy of Management Review, 1991,16(1):121-144.
[30] 王浩,刘芳.心理所有权理论研究的回顾与展望[J].学术研究,2007(10):70-76.
[31] 张德鹏,林萌菲,陈晓雁,等.顾客参与创新对口碑推荐意愿的影响研究:心理所有权的中介作用[J].管理评论,2015(12):131-140.
[32] Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks K T. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations[J].Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(2):298-310.
[33] 陈胜祥.农民土地所有权认知与农地制度创新——基于1995—2008年实证研究文献的统计分析[J].中国土地科学,2009(11):21-26.
[34] 洪名勇,施国庆.欠发达地区农地重要性与农地产权:农民的认知——基于贵州省的调查分析[J].农业经济问题,2007(5):35-43,111.
[35] Jussila I, Tarkiainen A, Sarstedt M, et al. Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing[J].Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2015, 23(2): 121-139.
[36] 小川竹一.中国集体土地所有权与总有论[J].经济法论坛,2014(2):256-280.
[37] 龙登高.中国传统地权制度论纲[J].中国农史,2020,39(2):58-64.
[38] 王利明,周友军.论我国农村土地权利制度的完善[J].中国法学,2012(1):45-54.
[39] 罗必良.农村宅基地制度改革:分置、开放与盘活[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(1):1-3.
[40] 陈小君,蒋省三.宅基地使用权制度:规范解析、实践挑战及其立法回应[J].管理世界,2010(10):1-12.
[41] 李江涛,熊柴,蔡继明.开启城乡土地产权同权化和资源配置市场化改革新里程[J].管理世界,2020(6):93-105,247.
[42] 杜焱强,王亚星,陈利根.中国宅基地制度变迁: 历史演变、多重逻辑与变迁特征[J].经济社会体制比较,2020(5):90-99.

相似文献/References:

[1]柴芳墨,孙永军.论基层政府侵害农民宅基地行为的规制[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2013,(04):90.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2013,(02):90.
[2]袁方成,靳永广.行政嵌入、村庄本位与治理多样性——基于对Y县宅基地改革的观察[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(05):96.
　YUAN Fangcheng,JIN Yongguang.Administrative Embeddedness, Village-Oriented Approach and Diversity of Governance: Taking Homestead System Reform in Y County as an Observation Object[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(02):96.
[3]贺雪峰.宅基地、乡村振兴与城市化[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(04):1.
　HE Xuefeng.Homestead, Rural Revitalization and Urbanization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(02):1.
[4]唐浩,张聪.土地制度应对农村人口老龄化：挑战与思路[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(04):34.
　TANG Hao,ZHANG Cong.How does Land System Cope with Ageing of Rural China?[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(02):34.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-05-08。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目"制度嵌入视角下试点地区农村宅基地制度改革模式的比较研究"(18BJY129)
作者简介:陈胜祥,男,江西财经大学旅游与城市管理学院教授,博士生导师,海峡两岸不动产研究中心主任。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01