[1]王晓毅,阿妮尔.从“超常规”到“常规化”:驻村帮扶如何助推乡村治理现代化[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(06):62-70.
　WANG Xiaoyi,Anier.From Hypernormal to Routinization: How Resident Working Mechanism in Village Boosts Rural Governance Modernization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(06):62-70.
点击复制

从“超常规”到“常规化”:驻村帮扶如何助推乡村治理现代化()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
62-70
栏目:
巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接
出版日期:
2021-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
From Hypernormal to Routinization: How Resident Working Mechanism in Village Boosts Rural Governance Modernization
作者:
王晓毅1; 2;  阿妮尔2
1. 中国社会科学院大学 社会学院, 北京 102488;
2. 中国社会科学院 社会学研究所, 北京 100732
Author(s):
WANG Xiaoyi1; 2;  Anier2
关键词:
驻村帮扶; 乡村治理; 现代化
Keywords:
Resident Working Mechanism in Village; Rural Governance; Modernization
分类号:
D262.3
摘要:
驻村帮扶不仅仅是向农村派驻工作队，而是一整套的制度设计。向农村派驻工作队是党的农村工作传统，但是精准扶贫时期的驻村帮扶与原有的干部下乡和农村工作队在时间节点、制度安排和作用上都有所差别。精准扶贫既处于全面建成小康社会的关键时期，也处于中国乡村向社会主义现代化的转折时期，驻村帮扶的短期效果体现为精准扶贫目标的实现，长期效果则助推了乡村治理现代化。驻村帮扶所带来的政府公共服务职能提升、行政资源下沉基层、顶层决策与群众参与的有机融合以及村级治理能力提升是乡村治理现代化的方向。在乡村振兴中，需要不断提升乡村治理现代化的水平，从制度上实现稳定的组织振兴。
Abstract:
Resident working in village not just refers to a working team, but to a whole set of system design. Sending resident working teams to village is the tradition of the Party’s rural endeavors, but the resident working mechanism in village during the Targeted Poverty Alleviation period is different from the previous ones in terms of timing, institutional arrangements, and functions. The Targeted Poverty Alleviation was conducted not only in the critical period of building a moderately prosperous society in all respects, but also in the transition period of China’s rural areas to socialist modernization. The short-term effect of resident working mechanism in village reflects the realization of the targeted poverty alleviation goal, and its long-term effect is reflected in the promotion of rural governance modernization. The directions of rural governance modernization would be the improvement of the government’s public service functions, the sinking of administrative resources at the grassroots level, the organic integration of top-level decision-making and mass participation, and the improvement of village-level governance capabilities, which have been brought about by the resident working mechanism in village. In rural revitalization, it is necessary to continuously improve the level of rural governance modernization, and achieve stable organizational revitalization from an institutional perspective.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邓燕华, 王颖异, 刘伟.扶贫新机制:驻村帮扶工作队的组织、运作与功能[J]. 社会学研究, 2020(6):44-66, 242-243.
[2] 张国磊.干部驻村、部门帮扶与跨层级治理——基于桂南Q市"联镇包村"制度运作分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 20(2):26-38.
[3] 李里峰.工作队:一种国家权力的非常规运作机制——以华北土改运动为中心的历史考察[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2010(3):207-214.
[4] 习近平.努力创新农村工作机制——福建省南平市向农村选派干部的调查与思考[J]. 求是, 2002(16):13-16.
[5] 赵阳. 从"农民负担"走向"公共财政"——从财税的视角对改革30年国家与农民关系的回顾[J]. 经济研究参考, 2008(31):44-51.
[6] 周飞舟. 从汲取型政权到"悬浮型"政权——税费改革对国家与农民关系之影响[J]. 社会学研究, 2006(3):1-39.
[7] 斯科特. 逃避统治的艺术[M]. 王晓毅, 译. 北京:生活·读书·新知三联出版社, 2016.
[8] 郭占锋. 走出参与式发展的"表象"——发展人类学视角下的国际发展项目[J]. 开放时代, 2010(1):132-141.
[9] 李博, 左停. 谁是贫困户?精准扶贫中精准识别的国家逻辑与乡土困境[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(4):7-13.
[10] 韩志明.从"粗糙的摆平"到"精致的治理"——群体性事件的衰变及其治理转型[J]. 政治学研究, 2020(5):91-100, 127-128.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚春明.精致的利己主义者：村干部角色及“无为之治——以赣东D镇乡村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(03):27.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(06):27.
[2]贺雪峰.论中坚农民[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(04):1.
[3]仝志辉.分利型村治中的贿选与村级权力正当性——基于L村选举史的讨论[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(03):1.
　TONG Zhihui.Discussion on Bribery-Election in Interest-Share-Type Village Governance and Village Power legitimacy: Based on Election History of X Village[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):1.
[4]徐加玉,左停.村级权力规范化中的治理动力问题——基于浙江N县的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):53.
　XU Jiayu,ZUO Ting.Power of Governance in Standardization of Village Power: Analysis of Practice in N County of Zhejiang[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(06):53.
[5]印子.职业村干部群体与基层治理程式化——来自上海远郊农村的田野经验[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):42.
　YIN Zi.Professional Village Cadres Group and Grassroots Governance Patterning: From the Fields Experience of the Outer Suburbs of Shanghai City[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(06):42.
[6]王阳,刘炳辉.宗族的现代国家改造与村庄治理——以南部G市郊区“横村”社区治理经验为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(03):41.
　WANG Yang,LIU Binghui.Modern State Transformation of Clan and Village Governance:A Case Study of Community Governance of‘Village Heng’in the Suburb of City G in Southern China[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(06):41.
[7]熊万胜,毕菲荣.论地权的基本内涵与地权模式的时空差异[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):77.
　XIONG Wansheng,BI Feirong.On the Basic Connotation of Land Rights Conception and the Space-Time Differences of Land Ownership Model[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(06):77.
[8]黄增付.土地经营权流转与乡村秩序整合[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):94.
　HUANG Zengfu.Circulation of Land Management Right and Rural Order Integration[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(06):94.
[9]朱静辉.精英与群众联结关系视野下的村庄治理——以浙中Y村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(05):59.
　ZHU Jinghui.On Village Governance from the Perspective of Elite-Mass Linkage: Taking Village Y in the Central Zhejiang as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(06):59.
[10]贺雪峰.改革开放以来国家与农民关系的变迁[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):11.
　HE Xuefeng.Changes in the Relationship between the State and the Peasants since the Reform and Opening-up[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(06):11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-08-09。
基金项目:中国社会科学院创新工程"乡村振兴与新时代农村社会治理（2020—2022）"
作者简介:王晓毅,男,中国社会科学院大学社会学院教授,中国社会科学院社会学研究所研究员;阿妮尔,女,中国社会科学院社会学研究所博士后。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01