[1]杨嵘均,喻包庆.数字治理嵌入乡村礼俗社会的可能路径及其调谐[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2023,23(03):84-94.
　YANG Rongjun,YU Baoqing.The Possible Path of Digital Governance and Its Readjustment in the Embedment in the Running of the Rural Etiquette and Custom Society[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2023,23(03):84-94.
点击复制

数字治理嵌入乡村礼俗社会的可能路径及其调谐()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
84-94
栏目:
乡村数字治理专题
出版日期:
2023-06-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Possible Path of Digital Governance and Its Readjustment in the Embedment in the Running of the Rural Etiquette and Custom Society
作者:
杨嵘均;  喻包庆
华东政法大学 马克思主义学院, 上海 201620
Author(s):
YANG Rongjun;  YU Baoqing
关键词:
乡村礼俗社会; 乡村治理; 数字治理; 技术理性; 价值理性
Keywords:
Rural Etiquette and Custom Society; Rural Governance; Digital Governance; Technical Rationality; Value Rationality
分类号:
D523
摘要:
在当下中国,随着以"技治主义"为核心的数字乡村建设的发展,乡村社会治理逐步显现数字治理与乡村礼俗社会运行二者之间衔接不畅的问题。这一现实反映出,以技术理性为核心、以现代性为导向的数字治理与以价值理性为核心、以传统习俗为准绳的乡村礼俗社会二者之间存在着潜在张力。这一潜在的张力,在乡村治理实践中表现为由于二者在自身所要求的制度规范、过程适应以及价值耦合等方面的差异性而产生的抵牾、摩擦乃至排斥,但这并不表明数字治理和乡村礼俗社会之间是不可调谐的。在一定条件下,二者又是可以相互融合并达成相互依存的同一体。要实现这一目标,就需要国家和地方政府在制定和执行政策过程中,既要适切地评估数字治理嵌入乡村礼俗社会后技术理性作用、正式制度运行、过程衔接顺畅以及价值理性耦合等方面的治理效能,又要重视和运用好乡村礼俗社会固有的非正式制度、礼俗秩序以及乡土人情等文化传承禀赋的治理价值,并在价值取向、治理边界以及运行秩序等方面进行调谐,逐步构建二者相融相合、相互依存的乡村治理体系。
Abstract:
In current China, with the governance pattern and policy direction with technological rationality as the core being constructed gradually, the rural governance presents a problem of incompatibility between digital governance and the operation of rural etiquette society, which reflects the potential tension between digital governance with technological rationality as the core and modernity as the guide, and rural etiquette and custom society with value rationality as the core and traditional customs as the criterion. This potential tension is manifested in the practice of rural governance as contradiction, friction and even exclusion due to the differences between the two in terms of institutional norms, process adaptation and value coupling required by themselves. However, this potential tension is not to be misadjusted. Under certain conditions, they can be integrated and be interdependent as well. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary that in the process of national and local policy formulation and implementation, we should not only properly evaluate the effectiveness as digital governance embedded in rural etiquette society in terms of technical rationality, formal system operation, smooth process connection and value rationality coupling, but also evaluate the benefits of the cultural inheritance endowment of rural etiquette society in terms of its inherent informal system, etiquette order and local human feelings. It is required that a rural governance system be built gradually, in which the value orientation, governance boundary and endogenous order should be adjusted and integrated between digital governance and rural etiquette and custom society as whole.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王国成,张世国.经济学实证分析方法的演进逻辑及发展新阶段[J].东南学术,2021(1):127-139.
[2] 习近平.不断做强做优做大我国数字经济[J].求是,2022(2):4-8.
[3] 王国成. 数字经济视域下的国家治理能力提升[J]. 天津社会科学, 2021, 12(6):100-107.
[4] 韩瑞波.敏捷治理驱动的乡村数字治理[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(4):132-140.
[5] 祝智庭,陈丹.数字治理:智慧学习新素养[J].电化教育研究,2014,35(9):9-17.
[6] 何哲.国家数字治理的宏观架构[J].电子政务,2019(1):32-38.
[7] 颜佳华,王张华.数字治理、数据治理、智能治理与智慧治理概念及其关系辨析[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,43(5):25-30.
[8] 徐晓林,周立新.数字治理在城市政府善治中的体系构建[J].管理世界,2004(11):140-141.
[9] 樊博,王妍.数字治理的发展逻辑解析[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2021,42(4):89-96.
[10] 李韬,冯贺霞.数字治理的多维视角、科学内涵与基本要素[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2022,59(1):70-79.
[11] 齐爱民,盘佳.数据权、数据主权的确立与大数据保护的基本原则[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,36(1):64-70.
[12] 安宝洋.大数据时代的网络信息伦理治理研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(5):641-646.
[13] 王胜,余娜,付锐.数字乡村建设:作用机理、现实挑战与实施策略[J].改革,2021(4):45-59.
[14] 丁波.数字赋能还是数字负担:数字乡村治理的实践逻辑及治理反思[J].电子政务,2022(8):32-40.
[15] 冯献,李瑾,崔凯.乡村治理数字化:现状、需求与对策研究[J].电子政务,2020(6):73-85.
[16] 吕普生.数字乡村与信息赋能[J].中国高校社会科学,2020(2):69-79.
[17] 王雯."十四五"时期加快数字乡村发展的思路和政策建议[J].中国发展观察,2020(S8):43-45.
[18] 李春.以理性构建新礼俗社会——梁漱溟乡村建设思想研究[J].孔子研究,2021(6):147-153.
[19] 郑跃平,Schachter H L.电子政务到数字治理的转型:政治、行政与全球化——评Digital Governance:New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation[J].公共行政评论,2014,7(1):170-177.
[20] 田锋, 缪听雨. 论数据拜物教的生成路径与祛魅之道[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 54(2):120-126.
[21] 刘永谋.论技治主义:以凡勃伦为例[J].哲学研究,2012(3):91-97.
[22] 梁漱溟. 中国文化要义[M]. 2版. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2011.
[23] 杨明, 孟天广, 方然. 变迁社会中的社会信任: 存量与变化——1990—2010年[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011,48(6):100-109.
[24] 林滨.从道德危机到存在危机——重建社会信任的思考[J].道德与文明,2011(5):37-43.
[25] 杨嵘均.论正式制度与非正式制度在乡村治理中的互动关系[J].江海学刊,2014(1):130-137.
[26] 刘少杰. 中国市场交易秩序的社会基础——兼评中国社会是陌生社会还是熟悉社会[J]. 社会学评论, 2014, 2(2):28-34.
[27] 费孝通.乡土中国[M].青岛:青岛出版社,2019:12.
[28] 郭明.虚拟型熟人社会:一个新乡村社会形态[J].探索与争鸣,2022(2):95-105.
[29] 卡斯特.网络社会的崛起[M].夏铸九,王志弘,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001:570,569.
[30] 陈绚. 信息论的"缺陷"——埃德加·莫兰对申农之批判[J]. 国际新闻界, 2003, 25(1):5-12.
[31] Hayek.Law,Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Orders[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1973:35-37.
[32] 贺雪峰,仝志辉.论村庄社会关联——兼论村庄秩序的社会基础[J].中国社会科学,2002(3):124-134.
[33] 梁治平.清代习惯法:社会与国家[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996:127-128.
[34] 沈费伟,刘祖云.村庄重建的实践逻辑与运作模式——以湖州市荻港村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(2):19-29.
[35] 谭九生,任蓉.大数据嵌入乡村治理的路径创新[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017,38(6):30-37.
[36] 李佳.乡土社会变局与乡村文化再生产[J].中国农村观察,2012(4):70-75.
[37] 疏仁华.家族博弈、精英行为与乡村治理[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(3):112-123.

相似文献/References:

[1]龚春明.精致的利己主义者：村干部角色及“无为之治——以赣东D镇乡村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(03):27.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2015,15(03):27.
[2]贺雪峰.论中坚农民[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2015,15(04):1.
[3]仝志辉.分利型村治中的贿选与村级权力正当性——基于L村选举史的讨论[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(03):1.
　TONG Zhihui.Discussion on Bribery-Election in Interest-Share-Type Village Governance and Village Power legitimacy: Based on Election History of X Village[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(03):1.
[4]徐加玉,左停.村级权力规范化中的治理动力问题——基于浙江N县的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2016,16(4):53.
　XU Jiayu,ZUO Ting.Power of Governance in Standardization of Village Power: Analysis of Practice in N County of Zhejiang[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2016,16(03):53.
[5]印子.职业村干部群体与基层治理程式化——来自上海远郊农村的田野经验[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(02):42.
　YIN Zi.Professional Village Cadres Group and Grassroots Governance Patterning: From the Fields Experience of the Outer Suburbs of Shanghai City[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):42.
[6]王阳,刘炳辉.宗族的现代国家改造与村庄治理——以南部G市郊区“横村”社区治理经验为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2017,17(03):41.
　WANG Yang,LIU Binghui.Modern State Transformation of Clan and Village Governance:A Case Study of Community Governance of‘Village Heng’in the Suburb of City G in Southern China[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2017,17(03):41.
[7]熊万胜,毕菲荣.论地权的基本内涵与地权模式的时空差异[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):77.
　XIONG Wansheng,BI Feirong.On the Basic Connotation of Land Rights Conception and the Space-Time Differences of Land Ownership Model[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):77.
[8]黄增付.土地经营权流转与乡村秩序整合[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):94.
　HUANG Zengfu.Circulation of Land Management Right and Rural Order Integration[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):94.
[9]朱静辉.精英与群众联结关系视野下的村庄治理——以浙中Y村为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(05):59.
　ZHU Jinghui.On Village Governance from the Perspective of Elite-Mass Linkage: Taking Village Y in the Central Zhejiang as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):59.
[10]贺雪峰.改革开放以来国家与农民关系的变迁[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(06):11.
　HE Xuefeng.Changes in the Relationship between the State and the Peasants since the Reform and Opening-up[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):11.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-07-18。
基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“网络符号消费的传播政治经济学批判研究”(20BZZ002)
作者简介:杨嵘均,男,华东政法大学马克思主义学院教授,博士生导师;喻包庆,男,华东政法大学马克思主义学院副教授。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01