[1]杨人豪,杨庆媛.资本下乡、经营土地与农政变迁——以成都市郫都区为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(03):128-138.
　YANG Renhao,YANG Qingyuan.Impact of Farmland Certification and Lineage Network on the Transfer of Farmland:Substitute or Complement[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(03):128-138.
点击复制

资本下乡、经营土地与农政变迁——以成都市郫都区为例()
分享到：

南京农业大学学报（社科版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
128-138
栏目:
土地问题
出版日期:
2022-07-16

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Farmland Certification and Lineage Network on the Transfer of Farmland:Substitute or Complement
作者:
杨人豪1;  杨庆媛2
1. 比利时荷语鲁汶大学 地球与环境科学学院, 比利时 鲁汶 B3000;
2. 西南大学 地理科学学院/西部乡村可持续发展新文科实验室, 重庆 400715
Author(s):
YANG Renhao1;  YANG Qingyuan2
关键词:
资本下乡; 集体经营性建设地入市; 农政变迁; 乡村振兴
Keywords:
Capital-flowing-to-countryside; Entry-into-market Reform of Rural Collective Commercial Construction Land; Agrarian Change; Rural Revitalisation
分类号:
F301.3
摘要:
基于对成都市郫都区的长期田野观察,构建了"资本下乡-经营土地-农政变迁"的分析框架,实证分析了两个村庄的资本下乡过程和影响。研究发现,地方政府主导和市场主导的资本下乡对两村进行了不同的塑造,但导致的农政变迁结果殊途同归。为建立乡村振兴模板,战旗村在地方政府大力扶持下,通过各类规划和国有企业投资,打造乡村振兴博览园核心示范区;白云村的发展则主要是市场引导的"消费性建成空间"塑造,投资企业利用集体建设用地打造田园综合体,将乡村空间符号化和商品化,供追求文化符号产品的城市中产消费。虽然两村资本下乡的主导力量和发展路径不尽相同,但其农政变迁具有一致性:以农村集体土地的资产化和资本化为核心,农业逐渐现代化和产业化,随之而来的是传统农民减少,职业农民和"新农人"增加,乡村地域更深地嵌入城市资本循环。研究表明,农政变迁的一致性源于两地的正式、非正式制度的稳定性和相同的资源配置方式,不同的治理方式仍可塑造相似的农村社会经济实践。
Abstract:
Farmland certification and lineage network affect farmers’ farmland transfer behavior to varying degrees, as representatives offormal and informal systems respectively. Starting from institutional theory, this paper is based on China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), focuses on the interaction mechanism between the two in the process of farmland transfer, and tests the substitution effect and complementary effect. The study finds that both farmland certification and lineage network strength can significantly increase the probability of farmland transfer out. They have a substitution effect on farmers’ farmland transfer behavior. However, with the increase in the number of rural household labor transfers, land certification and lineage network intensity can perform legal guarantee and social security functions, and the substitution effect of both farmland certification and the strength of lineage network gradually becomes insignificant, and shows a trend of complementary effects. What’s more, the interaction items between farmland certification and lineage network have no significant impact on the object of farmland transfer and farmland transfer fees, but the lineage network significantly increases the probability of farmland turning to outsiders. From the perspective of system operation, the effort made at guiding the weakening of the lineage network’s intervention in farmland transactions and enhancing its role in labor transfer is of great significance to further releasing the policy effect of the farmland certification and promoting the transfer of farmland. In addition, it is urgent to further explore the mechanism of the informal system on the market-oriented transactions of agricultural land.

参考文献/References:

[1] 仝志辉,温铁军.资本和部门下乡与小农户经济的组织化道路——兼对专业合作化道路提出质疑[J].开放时代,2009(4):5-26.
[2] 焦长权,周飞舟."资本下乡"与村庄的再造[J].中国社会科学,2016(1):100-116,205-206.
[3] 侯江华.资本下乡:农民的视角——基于全国214个村3203位农户的调查[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(1):81-87.
[4] 徐宗阳.资本下乡的农业经营实践——一个公司型农场内部的关系与风气[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(6):49-60.
[5] 陆文荣,卢汉龙.部门下乡、资本下乡与农户再合作——基于村社自主性的视角[J].中国农村观察,2013(2):44-56,94-95.
[6] 申明锐.从乡村建设到乡村运营——政府项目市场托管的成效与困境[J].城市规划,2020(7):9-17.
[7] 施德浩,陈浩,于涛.城市要素下乡与乡村治理变迁——乡村振兴的路径之辩[J].城市规划学刊,2019(6):107-113.
[8] 杨人豪,杨庆媛,冯一泰.农村集体经营性建设用地入市的基层治理研究——基于扎根理论对成都市郫都区宝华村的案例分析[J].西部论坛,2020(5):32-42.
[9] 陆剑.集体经营性建设用地入市的实证解析与立法回应[J].法商研究,2015(3):16-25.
[10] 吕萍,于璐源,丁富军.集体经营性建设用地入市模式及其市场定位分析[J].农村经济,2018(7):22-27.
[11] 孙阿凡,杨遂全.集体经营性建设用地入市与地方政府和村集体的博弈[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):20-27.
[12] 伏绍宏,洪运,唐欣欣.集体经营性建设用地入市收益分配机制:现实考量与路径选择——以郫都区为例[J].农村经济,2017(10):37-43.
[13] 杨庆媛,杨人豪,曾黎,等.农村集体经营性建设用地入市促进农民土地财产性收入增长研究——以成都市郫都区为例[J].经济地理,2017(8):155-161.
[14] 曲承乐,任大鹏.论集体经营性建设用地入市对农村发展的影响[J].中国土地科学,2018(7):36-41.
[15] 杨磊.农地产权变革与乡村治理秩序:一个农政变迁的分析框架——基于湖北省Z村的个案扩展研究[J].公共管理学报,2020(1):84-95,172.
[16] Kautsky K. The Agrarian Question[M]. London:Zwan, 1988.
[17] 叶敬忠,吴存玉.马克思主义视角的农政问题与农政变迁[J].社会学研究,2019(2):1-24,242.
[18] Bernstein H. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change[M]. Halifax:Kumarian Press,2010.
[19] Bernstein H. Some Reflectionson Agrarian Change in China[J].Journal of Agrarian Change,2015,15(3):454-477.
[20] Kay C. Political Economy, Class Alliances and Agrarian Change in Chile[J]. Journal of Peasant Studies,1981,8(4):485-513.
[21] McKay B M. The Politics of Agrarian Change in Bolivia’s Soy Complex[J]. Journal of Agrarian Change,2018,18(2):406-424.
[22] 叶敬忠. "三农问题":被夸大的学术概念及其局限[J].东南学术,2018(5):112-23,248.
[23] Harvey D. The New Imperialism[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2003.
[24] 严海蓉,陈义媛.中国农业资本化的特征和方向:自下而上和自上而下的资本化动力[J].开放时代,2015(5):49-69,6.
[25] Goodwin G. Fictitious Commodification and Agrarian Change:Indigenous Peoples and Land Markets in Highland Ecuador[J]. Journal of Agrarian Change,2021,21(1):3-24.
[26] Keyder ?, Yenal Z. Agrarian Change under Globalization:Markets and Insecurity in Turkish Agriculture[J]. Journal of Agrarian Change,2011,11(1):60-86.
[27] Zhang Q F. Class Differentiation in Rural China:Dynamics of Accumulation, Commodification and State Intervention[J]. Journal of Agrarian Change,2015,15(3):338-365.
[28] 潘璐,李华.遭遇产业转移的赵村:空间视角下的农政问题[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,35(4):5-17.
[29] 张京祥,姜克芳.解析中国当前乡建热潮背后的资本逻辑[J].现代城市研究,2016(10):2-8.
[30] Harvey D. The Limits to Capital[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1982.
[31] 贺雪峰.破除"还权赋能"的迷信——以《还权赋能——成都土地制度改革探索的调查研究》的主要观点与周其仁教授商榷[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2013(4):5-15.
[32] Williamson O E. The New Institutional Economics:Taking Stock, Looking Ahead[J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2000,38(3):595-613.
[33] Wu F. Planning Centrality, Market Instruments:Governing Chinese Urban Transformation under State Entrepreneurialism[J]. Urban Studies,2018,55(7):1383-1399.

相似文献/References:

[1]冯小.资本下乡的策略选择与资源动用——基于湖北省S镇土地流转的个案分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2014,(01):36.
　[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2014,(03):36.
[2]安永军.政权“悬浮”、小农经营体系解体与资本下乡——兼论资本下乡对村庄治理的影响[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(01):33.
　AN Yongjun.Regime “Suspension”, Disintegration of Small-Scale Operating System and Capital Downward to Rural Units: the Latter’s Influence on Village Governance[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):33.
[3]陈振,郭杰,欧名豪.资本下乡过程中农户风险认知对土地转出意愿的影响研究——基于安徽省526份农户调研问卷的实证[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(02):129.
　CHEN Zhen,GUO Jie,OU Minghao.On the Effects of Farmers’ Risk Perception on Their Out-Transference Willingness in the Process of Capital Downward the Countryside[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):129.
[4]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2018,18(03):19.
　HE Xuefeng.Some Issues in Rural Thriving Strategy Implementation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2018,18(03):19.
[5]徐宗阳.资本下乡的农业经营实践——一个公司型农场内部的关系与风气[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2019,19(06):49.
　XU Zongyang.The Agricultural Management Practice of Capital Going to the Countryside: the Relations and “Fengqi” within an Agriculture Enterprise[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2019,19(03):49.
[6]许悦,陈卫平.资本下乡如何嵌入本地农村社区？——基于117家生态农场的实证研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2020,20(02):69.
　XU Yue,CHEN Weiping.How Is Capital Going to the Countryside Embedded into Local Rural Community? An Empirical Study Based on 117 Eco-Farms[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2020,20(03):69.
[7]望超凡.资本下乡与小农户农业收入稳定性研究——兼论农村产业振兴的路径选择[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(01):11.
　WANG Chaofan.Capital Going to Countryside and Stability of Agricultural Income ofSmall Farmers: On Path Selection of Rural Industry Revitalization[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(03):11.
[8]何毅.资本下乡与经营“脱嵌”[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2021,21(03):118.
　HE Yi.Capital to the Countryside and “De-embedding” of Operation[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2021,21(03):118.
[9]仇叶.乡村旅游的景观制造逻辑与乡村产业发展路径——基于赣南C县梯田景观开发的实证调研[J].南京农业大学学报(社科版),2022,22(02):10.
　QIU Ye.Landscape Manufacturing Logic of Rural Tourism and the Development Path of Rural Industry: Study on the Development of a Terrace Landscape[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Science),2022,22(03):10.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-21。
基金项目:国家留学基金委国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(201806990020)
作者简介:杨人豪,男,比利时荷语鲁汶大学地球与环境科学学院地理与旅游系博士生
通讯作者:杨庆媛(通信作者),女,西南大学地理科学学院教授,博士生导师。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01